Back

Non-Canonical ERP Patterns in Second-language Sentence Processing: Evidence from Syntactic, Semantic, and Phonological Violations in Japanese Learners of English

Shalpoush, J.; Gallagher, D.; Yamada, E.; Ohta, S.

2026-01-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.05.697613 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesDespite notable advances in the neural mechanisms of second-language (L2) processing, few studies have systematically compared syntactic, semantic, and phonological processing of L2 within a single experimental design. We investigate the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying L2 sentence processing in native Japanese speakers with intermediate English proficiency. By integrating behavioral measures and event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined how syntactic, semantic, and phonological information influenced sentence comprehension. MethodsTwenty-seven participants completed an auditory sentence judgment task involving English sentences with a syntactic, semantic, or phonological error. ResultsBehavioral results revealed the highest accuracy in the control and semantic conditions, while syntactic and phonological violations led to significantly lower performance, indicating greater processing difficulty in these domains. Among the three linguistic violation types, phonological violations elicited the robust ERP negativities across both time 300-500 ms and 500-800 ms time windows, while syntactic and semantic violations evoked less consistent neural responses in this L2 auditory sentence judgment task. These results suggest that mismatches in expected phonological forms hinder lexical activation, triggering a negativity that resembles an N400 but reflects different underlying processes. ConclusionWe found non-canonical neural response patterns in L2 learners, characterized by sensitivity to phonological anomalies but minimal neural disruption for semantic or syntactic anomalies. The current study contributes to our understanding of L2 sentence processing in native Japanese speakers, particularly by aligning real-time neural responses with behavioral performance. This work offers implications for pedagogical practices and assessment strategies tailored to neurodiverse bilingual populations.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
18
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
21
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Psychophysiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%