Assessment Of Alphafold Protein Models For Small-Molecule Ligand Docking
Maidanik, H.; Lazou, M.; Bajaj, R.; Sarwar, R.; Vajda, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.
Show abstract
Molecular docking is a powerful computational tool for predicting protein-ligand interactions, widely employed in drug discovery. However, its effectiveness is often constrained by the availability of experimentally resolved X-ray protein structures, a process that is both time consuming and resource-intensive. AlphaFold (AF), a deep learning method, offers an efficient alternative by predicting high-accuracy 3D protein structures directly from amino acid sequences. This study assesses the utility of AF-generated protein models for fragment and larger ligand docking with Glide, a widely used docking approach. The docking workflow is evaluated in an unbiased manner by carrying out binding site identification with FTMap, a binding hot spot prediction software. We show that fragment docking to AF models outperforms docking to the respective unbound protein crystal structures, and performs comparably to docking to the corresponding ligand bound structures when using an unbiased approach. Leveraging computational efficiency of AF model generation, we also employ ensembles of AF models to incorporate protein flexibility. Results show that docking to AF ensembles improves larger-ligand docking compared to docking to singular AF models and outperforms docking to unbound structures. The results provide insights into the effectiveness of integrating AF protein models into docking procedures, highlighting the potential for streamlining computational drug discovery processes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEThis work addresses a critical bottleneck in computational drug discovery by demonstrating that AlphaFold (AF) models can serve as an alternative or complement to experimental structures for molecular docking. Specifically, a systematic study assessing Glide docking to rigid AF protein models and ensembles of models compared to experimentally determined ligand-bound and unbound protein X-ray structures was performed. The evaluation employs an unbiased methodology using FTMap-identified binding sites, eliminating the need for prior knowledge of the native ligand binding location. Additionally, protein flexibility is incorporated through a multiseed ensemble approach that generates a conformational ensembles of AF models at minimal computational cost, improving the docking accuracy without the need for ligand-bound templates.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sampling and ranking of protein conformations using machine learning techniques do not improve quality of rigid protein-protein docking 98%
- Are Deep Learning Structural Models Sufficiently Accurate for Virtual Screening? Application of Docking Algorithms to AlphaFold2 Predicted Structures 96%
- ArtiDock: accurate Machine Learning approach to protein-ligand docking optimized for high-throughput virtual screening 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking HelixFold3-Predicted Holo Structures for Relative Free Energy Perturbation Calculations 96%
- Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein-Ligand Complex Structure Prediction 94%
- Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-protein Binding Affinity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Software Methods for Estimating Protein-Protein Relative Binding Affinities 96%
- Ligand-induced Conformational Selection Predicts the Selectivity of Cysteine Protease Inhibitors 95%
- SenseNet, a tool for analysis of protein structure networks obtained from molecular dynamics simulations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.