Back

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the screening program for Diabetic Retinopathy at primary healthcare level in Patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Danang city, Vietnam

Tran, V. T. H.; Nguyen, D. Q.; Nguyen, L. H.

2026-01-03 health economics
10.64898/2026.01.02.26343334
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an annual screening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR) at primary healthcare level among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) from a societal perspective in Danang city, Vietnam. MethodsA Markov model was developed to compare costs and effects of an annual screening program for DR using non-mydriatic fundus photography with the absence of the screening on a cohort of 23,951 patients with type 2 DM aged 40 years in Danang city from a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon of 40 years. The effect was estimated using quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Costs were measured in both Viet Nam Dong and US dollar. Both costs and effects were discounted annually at 3%. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. ResultsThe ICER for the DR screening program compared with the absence of screening was VND 86,631,252 per QALY (USD 3,630/QALY). In the one-way sensitivity analyses, a decrease in the screening participation rate, screening every two years, lower sensitivity of fundus photography and the poor treatment compliance rate, as well as an increase in costs of screening and treatment, which all led to higher ICER values. Increasing the incidence of DM did not change ICER value. Conversely, reducing treatment costs caused lower ICER. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of VND 86,631,252 (USD 3,630) per QALY, the probability of the screening program being cost-effective was 92.3%. When the WTP increases at VND 95,294,377 (USD 3,993) or higher, the probability of cost-effectiveness approached 100%. ConclusionDiabetic retinopathy screening for patients with type 2 diabetes for aged 40 to 80 years is cost-effective in Danang city, Vietnam according to World Health Organization criteria.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 5%
37.8%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 9%
11.7%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 35%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 6%
3.2%
5
Journal of Medical Economics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
3.2%
6
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
7
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 4%
2.7%
8
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.8%
9
Eye
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
13
European Radiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
14
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 19%
0.9%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 10%
0.9%
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 19%
0.9%
19
AIDS
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 20%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 26%
0.8%
23
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 17%
0.5%