"I need policymakers to listen": a stakeholder needs assessment concerning anticipatory injectable medication systems, using a novel qualitative survey
Perera, B.; Bowers, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundAnticipatory injectable medications for symptom control are a key end-of-life care intervention. However, ensuring their safe and timely use in the community is a global challenge. The needs and priorities of stakeholders involved in processes for prescribing and administering these medications remain underexplored. We must understand these perspectives to design inclusive and adaptive systems. AimTo identify the needs and priorities of key stakeholders involved in community-based systems for using anticipatory injectable medications. DesignWe adopted a qualitative exploratory design, using an online survey between September and October 2024. Participants provided anonymised demographic information and completed up to four prompts capturing their stakeholder role, needs and priorities. Data were analysed using a combined inductive-deductive framework to produce synthesised shortlists of priorities and needs. Setting/participantsUK-based professional and public participants were recruited through social media, professional networks, charities, and public engagement events. ResultsIn total, 439 participants contributed 729 responses across various stakeholder groups. Findings revealed substantial diversity in stakeholder needs and priorities, both within and between groups. However, most stakeholder groups prioritised timely care, minimising of suffering, and wanted nationally consistent guidance for using injectable medications. Broader societal influences also shaped responses. ConclusionsOur findings highlight wide diversity in priorities and needs between stakeholders for using anticipatory injectable medications in the community. We propose that inclusive system design should include comprehensive assessment of key stakeholders needs and priorities, with the aim of providing better care. Our study demonstrates that stakeholder needs assessment offers a valuable framework to achieve this. What is already known about the topic?O_LIAnticipatory injectable medications are a widely used intervention in several countries to support timely end-of-life symptom control at home. C_LIO_LIThere are ongoing challenges with delays, inconsistent access, and variations in prescribing and governance across regions, indicating that system design influences both timeliness and safety. C_LIO_LIExisting research has primarily focused on the needs of individual professional groups, and no prior work has mapped the differing needs of all stakeholders involved in these systems. C_LI What this paper adds?O_LIOur study demonstrates that stakeholder groups have diverse needs but most share some core priorities -timely care, national consistency in practice guidance, and minimising suffering. C_LIO_LIWider societal factors and concerns shape stakeholder expectations of end-of-life medication systems. C_LIO_LIOur approach to stakeholder needs assessment reveals system requirements that consensus-based or single-perspective approaches often overlook. C_LI Implications for practice, theory, or policyO_LISystem improvements should be tailored to the specific needs of key stakeholder groups rather than assuming uniform priorities. C_LIO_LIStrong cross-stakeholder support exists for national, practical guidance on anticipatory prescribing, equipment, training, and governance. C_LIO_LIStakeholder needs assessment offers a useful method for designing safer, more responsive end-of-life medication systems. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
- Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal 94%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 95%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 94%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study 94%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 94%
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 95%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 95%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 94%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.