COVID-19 Impact on Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Hospitalizations for Diabetes-Related Amputation
Ionova, Y.; Zhong, L.; Vargas, R.; Ma, Y.; Wilson, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare services, potentially affecting diabetes management and complications. ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of the pandemic on lower extremity amputation (LEA) rates among individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, focusing on social determinants of health. MethodsA retrospective observational cohort study using de-identified claims data from a large U.S. health plan. LEA rates were compared before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic using interrupted time series analysis. ResultsIndividuals with type 2 diabetes experienced an initial decline in LEA rates followed by a significant increase (p=0.022) as delayed care needs were addressed. Individuals with type 1 diabetes showed no significant fluctuations in amputation rates. Social determinants were significantly associated with changes in LEA rates among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Lower-income ([≤]$40,000/year) and less educated individuals experienced significant increases in amputation rates (p=0.027 and p=0.043, respectively). Individuals aged 45-64 years showed a significant increase in LEA rates (p=0.013), while those aged 18-44 experienced a decrease (p=0.017). Metropolitan residents saw significant increases in LEA rates (p=0.021). ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted healthcare access for individuals with type 2 diabetes, leading to increased LEA rates. Social determinants of health exacerbated existing disparities in diabetes outcomes. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address healthcare disparities, especially during public health crises.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: A study of 46,407 Tweets between 2017 and 2019 94%
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 93%
- Time In Range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes– A systemic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 94%
- Metabolomic Risk Predictors of Diabetic Foot Complications: a longitudinal observational study 92%
- A Microbiome-targeting Fiber-enriched Nutritional Formula is Well Tolerated and Improves Quality of Life and Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic, Biomedical, and Sociodemographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 Positivity and Hospitalization in the San Francisco Bay Area 92%
- Cause of Death by Race and Ethnicity in Minnesota Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2019-2020 89%
- Differential Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Positivity, Hospitalization, and Death in the San Francisco Bay Area 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in diabetes patients admitted with COVID-19 in Dubai: a cross-sectional single centre study. 94%
- Frailty increases the risk of adverse outcomes among 38,950 UK Biobank participants with prediabetes: A prospective cohort study 89%
- What factors increase the risk of complications in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients? A cohort study in a nationwide Israeli health organization 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metformin Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 93%
- Diabetes and Mortality Among 1.6 Million Adult Patients Screened for SARS-CoV-2 in Mexico 91%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.