Back

COVID-19 Impact on Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Hospitalizations for Diabetes-Related Amputation

Ionova, Y.; Zhong, L.; Vargas, R.; Ma, Y.; Wilson, L.

2026-01-03 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.01.02.25342941 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare services, potentially affecting diabetes management and complications. ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of the pandemic on lower extremity amputation (LEA) rates among individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, focusing on social determinants of health. MethodsA retrospective observational cohort study using de-identified claims data from a large U.S. health plan. LEA rates were compared before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic using interrupted time series analysis. ResultsIndividuals with type 2 diabetes experienced an initial decline in LEA rates followed by a significant increase (p=0.022) as delayed care needs were addressed. Individuals with type 1 diabetes showed no significant fluctuations in amputation rates. Social determinants were significantly associated with changes in LEA rates among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Lower-income ([≤]$40,000/year) and less educated individuals experienced significant increases in amputation rates (p=0.027 and p=0.043, respectively). Individuals aged 45-64 years showed a significant increase in LEA rates (p=0.013), while those aged 18-44 experienced a decrease (p=0.017). Metropolitan residents saw significant increases in LEA rates (p=0.021). ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted healthcare access for individuals with type 2 diabetes, leading to increased LEA rates. Social determinants of health exacerbated existing disparities in diabetes outcomes. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address healthcare disparities, especially during public health crises.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.