Back

The SCCIP-N Trial Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nurse-Led Family Intervention with Hybrid Psychosocial and Physiological Outcome Assessment in Pediatric Cancer

Zeng, X.; Kong, Y.; Shi, Y.; Ye, Y.; Gu, C.

2026-01-02 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343247 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are prevalent among children with cancer and their families. Although family-based interventions such as the Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (SCCIP) are effective, their reliance on mental health specialists limits scalability, highlighting the need for nurse-led approaches. Methods and analysisThis multicenter randomized controlled trial will enroll 110 families of children with cancer to evaluate the efficacy of a nurse-led adaptation, the SCCIP-N. Participants from Hunan and Xinjiang will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention or an active control group. The study employs a hybrid outcome assessment strategy, integrating validated psychosocial measures with objective physiological monitoring. Assessments occur at baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 8 weeks (T3) post-intervention. The primary outcome is PTSS in children and caregivers. Secondary outcomes include posttraumatic growth, cognitions, anxiety, depression, family management, resilience, quality of life, and sleep quality. Objective physiological data (e.g., sleep, heart rate) from primary caregivers will be continuously collected using the Huawei Band 9. A process evaluation will follow the RE-AIM framework. Data will be analyzed according to intention-to-treat principles using linear mixed-effects models. DiscussionThis trial will evaluate the efficacy of a novel, nurse-led family intervention (SCCIP-N) for pediatric oncology families. By combining psychosocial and physiological assessment, it aims to provide a comprehensive, multidimensional evaluation of intervention effects. If effective, SCCIP-N could be integrated into routine care to improve family psychological outcomes and inform future implementation strategies. Trial registrationChiCTR, ChiCTR2500114338. Registered on Dec 10, 2025.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%