Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms
Mei, K.; Roshkovan, L.; Halliburton, S. S.; Sharma, S.; Ross, S.; Yu, Z.; Thompson, R.; Liu, L. P.; Dhanaliwala, A. H.; Litt, H.; Noel, P. B.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical performance of a cadmium-zinc-telluride-(CZT-) based photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system for low-dose lung cancer screening (LCS-LDCT) using patient-specific 3D-printed lung phantoms, and to compare its image quality and radiomics consistency with a conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT) system. MethodsSix 3D-printed lung phantoms, derived from patient CT datasets and representing various lesion types (solid, part-solid, and ground-glass), were imaged on PCCT and EIDCT scanners at matched dose levels (1.6 - 20.4 mGy). Quantitative image metrics, Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were assessed across dose levels. Radiomic features were extracted for each lesion and analyzed via principal component analysis to quantify feature consistency (within-cluster distance) and lesion type separability. ResultsPCCT demonstrated significantly lower image noise and higher CNR compared with EIDCT, particularly at lower dose levels. HU values were consistent across doses for both systems, with reduced variability in PCCT (coefficient of variation < 0.004). Radiomics analysis revealed tighter clustering (reduced within-cluster distances) and comparable lesion type separability between PCCT and EIDCT, indicating enhanced feature stability and lesion differentiation. Qualitative review confirmed superior lesion conspicuity and margin delineation with PCCT. ConclusionsCZT-based PCCT outperforms conventional EIDCT in quantitative and qualitative imaging metrics for LCS-LDCT, enabling superior image quality and radiomics reproducibility at reduced radiation doses. These findings support the clinical translation of PCCT for lung cancer screening and radiomics-based lesion characterization. Key pointsO_LIPCCT offers reduced image noise and improved CNR performance, especially at ultra-low doses. C_LIO_LIHU stability and radiomics reproducibility are enhanced with PCCT. C_LI Clinical relevance statementO_LIPCCT may enable further dose reduction without compromising diagnostic accuracy in LCS-LDCT. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 98%
- Reproducible spectral CT thermometry with liver-mimicking phantoms for image-guided thermal ablation 96%
- Precise dose verification in proton therapy using Positron Emission Tomography. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 94%
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 93%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 94%
- Radiosafe micro-computed tomography for longitudinal evaluation of murine disease models 93%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 98%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 91%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.