Back

Computationally Efficient Estimation of Localized Treatment Effects in High-Dimensional Design Spaces using Gaussian Process Regression

Ahmed, A.; Rahimian, M. A.; Chen, Q.; Kumar, P.

2025-12-30 health informatics
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343216 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTPopulation-scale agent-based simulations of the opioid epidemic help evaluate intervention strategies and overdose outcomes in heterogeneous communities and provide estimates of localized treatment effects, which support the design of locally-tailored policies for precision public health. However, it is prohibitively costly to run simulations of all treatment conditions in all communities because the number of possible treatments grows exponentially with the number of interventions and levels at which they are applied. To address this need efficiently, we develop a metamodel framework, whereby treatment outcomes are modeled using a response function whose coefficients are learned through Gaussian process regression (GPR) on locally-contextualized covariates. We apply this framework to efficiently estimate treatment effects on overdose deaths in Pennsylvania counties. In contrast to classical designs such as fractional factorial design or Latin hypercube sampling, our approach leverages spatial correlations and posterior uncertainty to sequentially sample the most informative counties and treatment conditions. Using a calibrated agent-based opioid epidemic model, informed by county-level overdose mortality and baseline dispensing rate data for different treatments, we obtained county-level estimates of treatment effects on overdose deaths per 100,000 population for all treatment conditions in Pennsylvania, achieving approximately 5% average relative error using one-tenth the number of simulation runs required for exhaustive evaluation. Our bi-level framework provides a computationally efficient approach to decision support for policy makers, enabling rapid evaluation of alternative resource-allocation strategies to mitigate the opioid epidemic in local communities. The same analytical framework can be applied to guide precision public health interventions in other epidemic settings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
5
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
8
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%