Back

A cross-domain test battery for comprehensive hearing loss characterisation using functional, physiological, and vestibular measures

Buhl, M.; Koifman, S.; Magbonde, A. S.; Kocoglu, K.; Hochmuth, S.; Partouche, E.; Coez, A.; Radeloff, A.; Thai-Van, H.; Wiener-Vacher, S.; Gerenton, G.; Warzybok, A.; Avan, P.; Kollmeier, B.

2025-12-30 otolaryngology
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343205 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis binational cross-centre study analyses a consented audiological-vestibular test battery for characterising age-related hearing loss, enabling precise phenotyping of suprathreshold functional, physiological, and vestibular factors beyond audibility. DesignStatistical analysis of centre effects to assess comparability of the test battery measured at two centres (Germany and France); statistical analysis of age and pure-tone average (PTA) effects per test to identify potential covariates. Samplen = 55 (39 German and 16 French) participants with hearing thresholds better than the age-dependent median of the PTA, aged 40 years or older. ResultsAge- and PTA-dependent reference data were derived. Due to negligible centre effects, all data were pooled across centres. Age and PTA effects were identified for some tests, especially for audiological-functional tests. No age effects were found for vestibular tests. ConclusionsNormative values for a clinically feasible, multidimensional audiological-vestibular test battery were provided, including several measures whose age and PTA dependencies were previously unclear. Age and PTA should be considered as covariates for interpretation of these tests in future applications such as, e.g., phenotype-genotype relations in specified cohorts.

Published in International Journal of Audiology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.