Back

RAPID: A Targeted Long-Read RNA Workflow for Functional Resolution of Splicing Variants in Rare Disease

Montgomery, K.-a.; Macpherson, H.; Anderson, C.; Wade, C.; Gustavsson, E. K.; Lynch, D. S.; Wilson, L. C.; Davison, J.; Wakeling, E.; Tuschl, K.; Houlden, H.; Clement, E.; Mills, P.; Ryten, M.

2026-01-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2025.12.30.25342835 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMolecular diagnosis of rare disease plateaus at [~]50%, partly due to technical limitations of short-read sequencing and the persistent challenge of interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Splice-altering variation represents a major source of unresolved cases, yet functional assessment remains difficult in routine practice. MethodsWe developed a fully modular, sample-to-answer workflow for targeted long-read RNA sequencing (lrRNA-seq) using Oxford Nanopore Technologies and applied it to six unsolved cases with suspected monogenic neurometabolic disease. Candidates were selected after WES/WGS and multidisciplinary team review (MDT) indicating [&le;]5 genes of interest. The workflow was designed to be diagnostically deployable, enabling near-full-length transcript assessment from accessible tissues without reliance on large control cohorts. ResultslrRNA-seq yielded actionable findings for all six probands. It confirmed pathogenic splice disruption in two cases, prompted gene exclusion in one case, and generated RNA-level evidence prioritising further DNA investigation in three cases. Across these scenarios, lrRNA-seq provided direct, mechanism-level insight that either resolved diagnosis or refined variant interpretation. The workflow provided near-full-length isoform structures with reproducible single-sample interpretation and produced informative results within two working days at <{pound}500 per sample reagent cost. ConclusionTargeted lrRNA-seq offers rapid, cost-effective functional evidence to resolve VUS, direct DNA follow-up, and support timely diagnosis in rare disease. The RAPID workflow demonstrates that long-read RNA sequencing can be implemented within existing diagnostic infrastructure and provides a scalable route to routine transcript-level assessment in clinical genomics.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.4%
5
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
6
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
7
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
8
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
9
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
12
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
14
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%