Back

Using WhatsApp to improve self-care management among type 2 diabetes patients in Ethiopia: A qualitative study

Foss, H.; Erlandsen, L. C.; Ogard-Repal, A.; Fossum, M.; Berhe, K.

2025-12-29 health informatics
10.64898/2025.12.29.25343156 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries is rising, and the most important treatment is maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Good diabetes self-care management is associated with better outcomes, but barriers to adhering to its management are knowledge deficits and a lack of social support. Traditionally, diabetes self-care management education and support are conducted by health care workers (HCWs), but limited access to HCWs restricts this activity. Digital health interventions can help overcome some barriers. ObjectiveTo describe type 2 diabetic patients perception of using WhatsApp for diabetes education, as well as the barriers and enablers they experienced in their usage, in the Tigray region of Ethiopia. MethodThis study is a collaboration between researchers from Norway and a researcher from Ethiopia. A qualitative explorative and descriptive approach was adopted. The co-researcher in Ethiopia recruited the participants, and research assistants conducted 17 interviews with a semi-structured interview guide based on the technology acceptance model. The interviews were conducted in Tigrinya, transcribed and translated to English, and de-identified before analysis. The data were analysed using NVIVO 14 with reflexive thematic analysis. ResultsFrom the data, the following four themes were developed: experienced enhanced self-care, digital access to HCWs, digital support, and barriers and enablers. The participants perceived WhatsApp as highly useful. The participants said that they gained new knowledge and experienced social support and increased access to HCWs when using WhatsApp. ConclusionWhatsApp was perceived as easy to use, but some barriers were reported. This study indicates that WhatsApp may contribute to enhancing access to diabetes self-care management education and support.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
3
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
13
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%