Back

Optimizing Mobile Health Clinic Placement via Geospatial Modeling

Tanim, S. H.; White, D.; Witrick, B.; Rennert, L.

2026-01-02 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2025.12.29.25342286 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesMobile health clinics (MHCs) provide flexible, community-based care to underserved populations facing geographic and socioeconomic barriers. Maximizing coverage enables MHCs to reach more individuals, improve preventive and continuous care, and reduce health disparities. However, few strategies exist to guide placement and routing decisions. We present a framework to increase MHC utilization by optimizing service coverage. Study DesignThis is a retrospective study. MethodsWe analyzed MHC deployments for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening and treatment from a local health system in South Carolina. We used a location-allocation model to identify potential MHC placement sites that maximized the number of uninsured residents within a 5-minute drive or 10-minute walk. Demand was represented by block centroids weighted by the size of the uninsured population. We compared service area population, defined as the size of the target population within driving or walking distance, for model-proposed sites with coverage from previous MHC deployments. We fit negative binomial mixed effects models to evaluate the association between service area population and MHC utilization. ResultsOptimized placements can nearly double population coverage, expanding access to uninsured residents within practical travel distances by 90% for driving and 135% for walking--without requiring additional vehicles or resources. This approach also substantially reduces redundant service areas while shortening average travel times. Results show that small geographic shifts can yield significant improvements. In rural regions, greater geographic coverage is significantly associated with higher MHC utilization for HCV screening (drive p=.0037; walk p=.0095). We applied this framework with local health partners to guide real-world MHC deployment in South Carolina. ConclusionsThis framework connects spatial analytics to service delivery, offering a replicable, operationally ready tool adaptable to various travel modes, site types, and disease contexts. It supports strategic placement in high-need locations by reducing travel time and service redundancy and ultimately improving health outcomes in medically underserved populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
11
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
19
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
22
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%