Back

Open-Source Offline-Deployable Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for Assisting Pancreatic Cancer Staging

Johno, H.; Amakawa, A.; Komaba, A.; Tozuka, R.; Johno, Y.; Sato, J.; Yoshimura, K.; Nakamoto, K.; Ichikawa, S.

2026-01-01 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2025.12.26.25343050 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in radiology, but key challenges remain, including data leakage from cloud-based systems, false outputs, and limited reasoning transparency. This study aimed to develop an open-source, offline-deployable retrieval-augmented LLM (RA-LLM) system in which local execution prevents data leakage and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves output accuracy and transparency using reliable external knowledge (REK), demonstrated in pancreatic cancer staging. Materials and MethodsLlama-3.2 11B and Gemma-3 27B were used as local LLMs, and GPT-4o mini served as a cloud-based comparator. The Japanese pancreatic cancer guideline served as REK. Relevant REK excerpts were retrieved to generate retrieval-augmented responses. System performance, including classification accuracy, retrieval metrics, and execution time, was evaluated on 100 simulated pancreatic cancer CT cases, with non-RAG LLMs as baselines. McNemar tests were applied to TNM staging and resectability classification. ResultsRAG improved TNM staging accuracy for all LLMs (GPT-4o mini 61%[-&gt;]90%, p<0.001; Llama-3.2 11B 53%[-&gt;]72%, p<0.001; Gemma-3 27B 59%[-&gt;]87%, p<0.001) and mildly improved resectability classification (72%[-&gt;]84%, p=0.012; 58%[-&gt;]73%, p=0.006; 77%[-&gt;]86%, p=0.093), with Gemma-3 27B showing performance comparable to GPT-4o mini. Retrieval performance was high (context recall = 1; context precision = 0.5-1), and local models ran at speeds comparable to the cloud-based GPT-4o mini. ConclusionWe developed an offline-deployable RA-LLM system for pancreatic cancer staging and publicly released its full source code. RA-LLMs outperformed baseline LLMs, and the offline-capable Gemma-3 27B performed comparably to the widely used cloud-based GPT-4o mini.

Published in Japanese Journal of Radiology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.