Back

Effects of polygenic liability for autism on neonatal thalamocortical connectivity and behavioral outcomes across sex

Chiem, E.; Ganesh, S. S. A.; Dodson, J.; Dapretto, M.; Hernandez, L. M.

2025-12-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2025.12.23.25342934 medRxiv
Show abstract

Functional brain networks are altered in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), with differences in thalamocortical connectivity detectable as early as infancy. ASD shows distinct sex differences, not only in diagnostic rates, but also in brain and behavioral manifestations of the condition. Although common variants account for much of the genetic liability for ASD, little is known about the impact of ASD-associated genetic variation on functional brain connectivity and behavioral outcomes in early life or how this may differ between males and females. Here, we utilize functional MRI (fMRI), genetic, and behavioral data from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) to investigate sex differences in the association between ASD polygenic scores (PGS), thalamocortical functional connectivity (37-44 weeks postmenstrual age), and behavioral outcomes (18 months) in European term-born infants. We show that across the full sample, higher ASD PGS is associated with weaker thalamic connectivity with posterior parietal cortex, as well as greater ASD-related and ADHD symptoms and slower motor development. Sex differences in the relationship between ASD PGS and thalamic connectivity largely encompassed sensorimotor, posterior parietal, temporal, and insular cortices. Further, in female infants, thalamic connectivity patterns associated with greater genetic liability for ASD were related to poorer motor development. These findings suggest genetic predisposition for ASD shapes early thalamocortical functional connectivity in a sex-specific manner and negatively impacts behavioral development in early toddlerhood.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.