Back

Access to Care in PANS: A Survey of Families Journeys to and Experiences with IVIG Treatment

Calaprice, D.; Moon, C.; Helvick, M.; Harvey, C.; Tang, A.; Aguirre, K.; Hunt, J.; Terreri, R.; Whitty, C.; Fitzgerald, M.

2025-12-30 pediatrics
10.64898/2025.12.23.25342929
Show abstract

BackgroundPediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) is characterized by abrupt-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms, often infection- or immune-triggered. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is recommended by expert guidelines for select cases, yet insurance denials and high out-of-pocket costs have been major barriers to access. MethodsWe surveyed 60 caregivers and/or adult PANS patients who pursued IVIG therapy, collecting data on insurance experiences, treatment protocols, financial strategies, and patient/caregiver quality of life (QoL) before and after treatment. ResultsMost patients (88%) eventually received IVIG; 10% were still in pursuit, and 2% discontinued trying. Insurance approval without appeal occurred in only 18%, while many families faced multiple denials and appeals. Insurance approvals were more expeditious for patients with comorbidities for which IVIG is typically covered; among those receiving IVIG for PANS alone, only 5% were treated within a month of the doctors order (compared to 38% of those receiving IVIG for comorbidities as well as PANS) and 14% waited [≥]9 months before treatment began. Financial strain was routine: one-third of families without substantial coverage (i.e., insurance that covered >=70% of expenses) reported extreme stress (10/10), 58% borrowed money, and 21% sold major assets. Even families with substantial insurance coverage commonly depleted savings or took on additional work. Prior to IVIG, patient Quality of Life (QoL) ratings were poor (means 2.1-2.8 across domains), with over one-third selecting the lowest possible ratings. During the six months following IVIG initiation, mean scores rose to 6.2-6.8, with over 60% reporting "good" to "exceedingly good" outcomes. Caregivers reported parallel gains, with family QoL ratings rising from 2.4-4.0 pre-treatment to 5.7-6.6 post-treatment. ConclusionsFamilies pursuing IVIG for PANS faced prolonged delays, repeated denials, and extreme financial strain, often resorting to loans, asset sales, and additional work. Despite these burdens, IVIG was associated with marked improvements in quality of life for both patients and caregivers, underscoring the treatments potential benefits and the urgent need for more equitable access.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Neurology
based on 43 papers
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 3%
7.7%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
5.4%
4
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 3%
5.4%
5
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
5.1%
6
Pediatrics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 72%
4.5%
8
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
based on 35 papers
Top 0.8%
2.8%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Archives of Disease in Childhood
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
2.8%
13
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 41%
1.6%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
15
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
1.6%
16
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
17
BMJ Paediatrics Open
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Pediatric Research
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
21
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Pediatrics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
25
Canadian Medical Association Journal
based on 15 papers
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
JAMA Pediatrics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
28
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 8%
0.7%