Machine Learning-Based Identification of Blood Biomarkers that Distinguish Precachectic and Cachectic Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Olumoyin, K. D.; Park, M. A.; Davis, E.; Permuth, J. B.; Rejniak, K. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIdentification of minimally invasive biomarkers of different stages of cachexia (Ca), and precachexia (PCa) in particular, might help clinicians in treating patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at high risk of progressing to a more severe cachectic stage. In this work, we developed a machine-learning (ML) model optimized to blood biomarkers data that identifies precachectic and cachectic patients. MethodsBlood and clinical data was collected from treatment-naive patients with PDAC through the Florida Pancreas Collaborative (FPC), a multi-institutional cohort study and biobanking initiative. Blood was processed into serum and assayed for a total of 35 candidate biomarkers. Participants were classified as having noncachexia (NCa), precachexia, or cachexia according to modified criteria by Vigano and colleagues which consider unintentional weight loss and biochemical data. Using these data, we designed ML algorithms to: (i) pre-select predictive blood biomarker candidates using a combination of mutual information method together with the leave-one-feature-out (LOFO) feature importance approach; (ii) identify the minimal combination of predictive biomarkers using the forward feature selection method; (iii) determine the optimal classification hyperparameters for the support vector machine using a cross-validation technique; and (iv) adjust the decision-boundary threshold for imbalanced data using the Matthews correlation coefficient. Three ML-based binary predictors were designed to determine patients cachexia status: NCa vs. Ca; PCa vs. Ca; and PCa vs. NCa. ResultsThe biomarker levels from 184 patients (28 NCa, 53 PCa, and 103 Ca) were used in this study. The NCa vs. Ca predictor identified a set of 6 biomarkers and yielded area under the curve (AUC) of 0.835. The PCa vs. Ca predictor identified a set of 6 biomarkers and yielded AUC of 0.810. The PCa vs. NCa predictor identified a set of 5 biomarkers and yielded AUC of 0.771. ConclusionsThe developed ML models that use blood biomarker data provided effective predictions of patients cachexia stage that can help clinicians to diagnose PCa.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 95%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 95%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 96%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 95%
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing deep learning-based strategies to predict the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from electronic health records 93%
- Discovering Signature Disease Trajectories in Pancreatic Cancer and Soft-tissue Sarcoma from Longitudinal Patient Records 93%
- Graph-Based Clinical Recommender: Predicting Specialists Procedure Orders using Graph Representation Learning 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.