'Ready for tomorrow: eHealth readiness in top clinical hospitals surveyed
Garritsen, G.; den Ouden, M. E. M.; Beerlage-de Jong, N.; Kelders, S. M.
Show abstract
Technological innovations such as eHealth are vital for improving healthcare accessibility, quality, and sustainability. While most research addresses adoption at the individual or team level, less is known about organisational factors enabling sustainable transformation. Organisational readiness is a key determinant of success. The Organizational eHealth Readiness (OeHR) model, developed in Polish primary care, assesses five dimensions: Strategy, Competence, Culture, Structure, and Technology, but its applicability in Dutch health care remains unclear. This mixed-methods study evaluated the OeHR model in Dutch hospitals. A validated 32-item questionnaire, translated into Dutch, was completed by managers and implementation specialists of 15 top-clinical hospitals (n=22). Descriptive statistics, regression analyses, and Principal Component Analysis provided insight into how the five dimensions jointly reflect organisational readiness for eHealth. Three focus groups (n=14) in two hospitals explored construct interpretation, missing dimensions, and model usability. Qualitative data were analysed using deductive coding on OeHR dimensions and emergent themes to refine the questionnaire. Quantitative analyses identified organisational culture as the only significant predictor of subjective eHealth readiness, while other dimensions showed no independent effect. Open responses and focus groups confirmed the centrality of culture and suggested refinements to all components, including clearer definitions, structural flexibility, and attention to external factors. Overall, the OeHR model was valued for strategic guidance but required contextualisation for practical use. This study showed that the OeHR model provides a valuable framework for assessing eHealth readiness in Dutch hospitals, with cultural readiness emerging as the most influential yet conceptually ambiguous dimension. Strategy, competence, structural and technological readiness mainly act as contextual enablers rather than direct predictors. The findings highlight the need to refine definitions, reduce overlap, and explore additional layers such as personal, operational, and societal readiness. Strengthening conceptual clarity and developing context-sensitive tools could enhance applicability and guide hospitals in translating readiness into digital transformation. Author summaryeHealth, such as home monitoring and online consultations with healthcare providers, is becoming increasingly important. Hospitals want to implement eHealth effectively, but this is only possible if the organisation is ready for it. The Organisational eHealth Readiness model helps to assess how "eHealth-ready" an organisation is. This model looks at five components: strategy, competencies, culture, structure and technology. In our research, we examined whether this model is also suitable for Dutch hospitals and which factors were still missing. We did this using a questionnaire among professionals and three focus groups, all involved in the implementation of eHealth. This showed that all components of the model are important, but that the culture of the organisation plays a central role. If employees are open to change and innovation, this acts as a driving force for eHealth. The other components, such as technology and strategy, appear to be primarily preconditions: necessary, but not sufficient to enable real change. Participants found the model useful, but felt that some factors were missing, such as leadership, collaboration, flexibility and the influence of legislation and regulations. They also mentioned that the organisation must have the capacity to cope with change effectively. Adapting the model to include these points could better support hospitals in healthcare transformation in the future.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 96%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How the COVID-19 pandemic is favoring the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare: a literature review 95%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 93%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 96%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 96%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Telemedicine Ready or Not? a cross-sectional assessment of telemedicine maturity of federally funded tertiary health institutions in Nigeria 94%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 93%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.