LLM-Based Classification of Case Report Abstracts: A Pilot Study on Interactions between Radiotherapy and Systemic Therapies
Dennstaedt, F.; Bobnar, T.; Handra, A.; Putora, P. M.; Filchenko, I.; Brueningk, S.; Aebersold, D. M.; Cihoric, N.; Shelan, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe growing volume of biomedical literature, especially in oncology, necessitates automated tools for extracting clinically relevant information. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for data extraction in this domain. However, their potential to extract clinically relevant information from case reports detailing rare treatment interactions, remains underexplored. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed for case reports on interactions between radiotherapy (RT) and Pembrolizumab, Cetuximab, or Cisplatin. A random sample of 100 report abstracts for each therapy was manually classified by two independent medical experts using 17 Boolean questions about patient demographics, treatment, cancer type and outcome with mutually exclusive answers, forming a ground truth. An LLM-based system with the open-source GPT models (GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B) was applied to classify these reports and the remaining dataset entries using the defined question structure. Performance of the LLM-based information extraction was evaluated using the standard classification metrics accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores. ResultsThe systematic searches yielded 320 (Pembrolizumab), 147 (Cetuximab), and 2055 (Cisplatin) publications. Inter-rater agreement for manual classification was high (Cohens kappa = 0.87), though lower (0.60-0.80) for specific outcome and cancer type questions. The LLM-based classification (GPT-OSS-120B model) achieved high overall performance with an F1-score of 94.33% (95.83% accuracy, 93.69% precision, 94.98% recall). Performance was consistent across systemic therapies, with the smaller GPT-OSS-20B model showing similar results (F1-score 94.06%). Analysis of the entire datasets revealed that 56.02% of publications described patients who received both RT and systemic therapy. Proportions of positive and negative outcomes varied by therapy and sequencing. ConclusionsLLM-based classification systems demonstrate high accuracy and reliability for curating scientific case reports on RT and systemic therapy interactions. These findings support their potential for high-throughput hypothesis generation and knowledge base construction in oncology, particularly for underutilized case reports, with even smaller open-source models proving effective for such tasks.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models to help appeal denied radiotherapy services 96%
- NCT Precision Oncology Thesaurus Drugs – a Curated Database for Drugs, Drug Classes, and Drug Targets in Precision Cancer Medicine 92%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer 95%
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 94%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 92%
- A Comparative Analysis in a Clinical Cohort: Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations and a Novel Super Learner-Based Imputation Approach 91%
- Creating an Indexing Scheme for Case Series Articles 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors 93%
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 92%
- Genome-wide investigation of gene-cancer associations for the prediction of novel therapeutic targets in oncology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT in glioma patient adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? 93%
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 91%
- Network Graph Representation of COVID-19 Scientific Publications to Aid Knowledge Discovery 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.