Back

LLM-Based Classification of Case Report Abstracts: A Pilot Study on Interactions between Radiotherapy and Systemic Therapies

Dennstaedt, F.; Bobnar, T.; Handra, A.; Putora, P. M.; Filchenko, I.; Brueningk, S.; Aebersold, D. M.; Cihoric, N.; Shelan, M.

2025-12-29 health informatics
10.64898/2025.12.22.25342797
Show abstract

BackgroundThe growing volume of biomedical literature, especially in oncology, necessitates automated tools for extracting clinically relevant information. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for data extraction in this domain. However, their potential to extract clinically relevant information from case reports detailing rare treatment interactions, remains underexplored. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed for case reports on interactions between radiotherapy (RT) and Pembrolizumab, Cetuximab, or Cisplatin. A random sample of 100 report abstracts for each therapy was manually classified by two independent medical experts using 17 Boolean questions about patient demographics, treatment, cancer type and outcome with mutually exclusive answers, forming a ground truth. An LLM-based system with the open-source GPT models (GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B) was applied to classify these reports and the remaining dataset entries using the defined question structure. Performance of the LLM-based information extraction was evaluated using the standard classification metrics accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores. ResultsThe systematic searches yielded 320 (Pembrolizumab), 147 (Cetuximab), and 2055 (Cisplatin) publications. Inter-rater agreement for manual classification was high (Cohens kappa = 0.87), though lower (0.60-0.80) for specific outcome and cancer type questions. The LLM-based classification (GPT-OSS-120B model) achieved high overall performance with an F1-score of 94.33% (95.83% accuracy, 93.69% precision, 94.98% recall). Performance was consistent across systemic therapies, with the smaller GPT-OSS-20B model showing similar results (F1-score 94.06%). Analysis of the entire datasets revealed that 56.02% of publications described patients who received both RT and systemic therapy. Proportions of positive and negative outcomes varied by therapy and sequencing. ConclusionsLLM-based classification systems demonstrate high accuracy and reliability for curating scientific case reports on RT and systemic therapy interactions. These findings support their potential for high-throughput hypothesis generation and knowledge base construction in oncology, particularly for underutilized case reports, with even smaller open-source models proving effective for such tasks.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 2%
7.8%
3
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 0.9%
7.8%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
7.8%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 3%
4.9%
6
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 49%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 1%
3.1%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
11
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
12
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
13
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 78%
2.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
15
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
17
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 10%
1.4%
18
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Research Synthesis Methods
based on 17 papers
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Radiotherapy and Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 24%
0.7%
25
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 20%
0.7%