Back

Severe visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: outcomes, co-infections and mortality in a prospective real-world cohort

Ayele, E.; Henten, S. v.; Ayalew, D. G.; Atnafu, S.; Mereed, A. E.; Yohannes, H.; Mekonnen, T.; Bogale, T.; Mossa, A.; Legese, G. L.; Yasin, J.; Berens-Riha, N.; Pham, T.-T.; Boodman, C.; Mondelaers, A.; Adriaensen, W. J.; Abdellati, S.; Diro, E.; Mohammed, R.; Alves, F.; Asres, M. S.; Pareyn, M.; Kassa, M.; Griensven, J. v.

2025-12-21 infectious diseases
10.64898/2025.12.19.25342642 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) remains a major public health challenge in East Africa, particularly in Ethiopia. Clinical trials on VL often exclude patients with severe comorbidities or laboratory abnormalities, limiting the generalizability of evidence used to guide real-world management. We comprehensively characterised the clinical profile, treatment outcomes, and mortality of VL patients treated in a referral centre. Methododology/Principal findingsThis prospective cohort study enrolled patients at the Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center (LRTC), University of Gondar (02/2023-06/2024). All VL cases fulfilling eligibility criteria underwent detailed clinical, laboratory, and radiological assessments. VL treatment followed WHO guidelines. Outcomes, adverse events, and supportive care measures were recorded during treatment and over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients meeting at least one exclusion criterion (e.g. comorbidities, clinical signs of severe VL) of standard phase III VL treatment trials were defined as trial-ineligible patients and compared with trial-eligible patients. A total of 314 VL patients, mostly young adult males (median age 22 years), were enrolled. Of these, 21 (6.7%) had HIV co-infection; 204 (65%) met [≥]1 key exclusion criterion typically used in VL clinical trials. Trial-ineligible patients had high parasitemia, more concurrent infections, more pronounced clinical and laboratory abnormalities and a higher need of supportive care measures including systemic antibiotics and blood transfusion. Overall cure rate was 90.1%. Mortality after the first VL treatment course was 6.4%, ranging from 1.8% in trial-eligible patients to 8.8% in trial-ineligible patients. Leading causes of death included severe bacterial infections, acute liver failure, and haemorrhagic complications. ConclusionsThese findings underscore the severity and complexity of VL in routine care in our study population, and highlight the limitations of current trial populations to inform broader clinical practice. Strengthening supportive care and expanding research inclusivity designed to respond to the needs of this patient population are critical to achieve VL elimination targets. Author SummaryVisceral leishmaniasis is a life-threatening disease that continues to affect many people in East Africa, especially in Ethiopia. However, many of the patients we see in everyday clinical practice are very different from the carefully selected patients who take part in clinical trials. Trials often exclude people who are severely ill or who have other medical problems, which means that the results may not fully represent the patients who most need treatment. In this study, we followed people treated for visceral leishmaniasis at a referral centre to better understand how they present, how they respond to treatment, and what challenges they face. Most of the patients we treated would not have been eligible for typical clinical trials. These patients were more severely ill, had more infections, and required more intensive supportive care, such as antibiotics or blood transfusions. While most people were cured, those with more severe illness had a higher risk of death, often due to serious infections or bleeding. By describing the real-world situation of patients with visceral leishmaniasis, we show that current research does not fully capture the needs of the most vulnerable groups. We highlight the importance of improving supportive care and making future studies more inclusive.

Published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.