Hormonal contraception and SSRIs influence on oxytocin and cortisol reactivity to stress in patients with borderline personality disorder
Teixeira De Almeida, M.; Quattrocchi, L.; Perroud, N.; Aboulafia Brakha, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundBorderline personality disorder (BPD) involves emotional instability and stress sensitivity linked to oxytocinergic and HPA-axis dysregulation. This study examined oxytocin and cortisol responses to acute psychosocial stress and the modulatory effects of SSRIs and hormonal contraception. Methods93 female participants (45 with BPD with/without SSRIs and 48 healthy controls) underwent the Trier Social Stress Test. Linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models were applied to assess time, group, and hormonal contraception effects, and their interactions. ResultsDuring the stress task, both BPD groups reported significantly higher subjective anxiety and anger than controls. All participants showed increased salivary oxytocin (OXT) during stress anticipation, but post-task trajectories diverged: BPD participants without SSRIs exhibited a sharp OXT decline, whereas those on SSRIs mirrored the stable trajectory of controls. Hormonal contraception reversed the OXT decline in untreated BPD participants, resulting in a progressive increase during recovery. Cortisol (CORT) analyses revealed hyporeactivity in BPD participants without SSRIs, a pattern unaffected by hormonal contraception. A significant three-way interaction indicated that higher OXT levels were associated with higher CORT concentrations during late recovery specifically in the BPD SSRI group, a relationship that was marginal in untreated patients and absent in controls. ConclusionsOur findings confirm that neuroendocrine dysregulation in BPD is context-dependent and sensitive to pharmacological modulation. The ability of SSRIs and hormonal contraception to influence stress-response patterns, despite limited efficacy on core symptoms, highlights the importance of controlling for medication and hormonal status in future BPD biomarker research.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in affect variability after starting gender-affirming hormone therapy 95%
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels 94%
- Reduced threat avoidance but increased stress induced approach bias in women taking oral contraceptives 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 94%
- What is the relation between major depressive disorder and amygdala reactivity? 94%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cue-induced cocaine craving enhances psychosocial stress and vice versa in chronic cocaine users 94%
- Altered association of plasmatic oxytocin with affective stress responses in alcohol use disorder 94%
- The effect of acute stress on the balance between goal-directed and habit networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A single dose of lamotrigine induces a positive memory bias in healthy volunteers 94%
- No Relationship between Male Pubertal Timing and Depression – New Insights from Epidemiology and Mendelian Randomization 93%
- Disentangling heterogeneity of psychosis expression in the general population: sex-specific moderation effects of environmental risk factors on symptom networks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.