Back

Linguistic Features from Paragraph Recall are Markers of Cognitive Impairment

Park, S.; Roth, N.; Barker, M.; Auerbach, S.; Perls, T. T.; Cosentino, S.; Au, R.; Libon, D. J.; Sebastiani, P.; Andersen, S. L.

2025-12-19 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2025.12.18.25342497 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveCognitive impairment is associated with language changes that may be elicited from verbal responses during neuropsychological assessments that are not captured in traditional scoring. The current study investigated the utility of a linguistic analysis of paragraph recall responses for differentiating participants with and without cognitive impairment. MethodsDigital voice recordings of Logical Memory (LM) were available from 598 participants from the Long Life Family Study with normal cognition and 112 with cognitive impairment. Linguistic polyfeature scores for immediate (PFS-IR) and delayed recall (PFS-DR) were created from a weighted sum of features associated with cognitive impairment. Logistic regression models assessed the predictive value of each PFS and demographics for classifying cognitive impairment. Repeated measures models with Generalized Estimating Equations assessed whether PFSs predict decline on a cognitive screener. ResultsBoth immediate and delayed PFSs were significantly associated with cognitive status (PFS-IR {beta} = 0.05, p<.001; PFS-DR {beta} = 0.07, p<.001). A classifier with PFS-DR and demographics closely approximated the accuracy of the traditional LM score and demographics (AUC-PR = 0.81 vs 0.84, respectively). A higher PFS-DR was also associated with greater cognitive decline over an average of 5 years of follow-up ({beta} = -0.08, p<.001). ConclusionQuantification of linguistic features from paragraph recall using a linguistic PFS provides sufficient information for detecting cognitive impairment and predicting incident cognitive decline. The linguistic PFS has the potential to be integrated into automated testing, recording, and scoring pipelines allowing for the implementation of sensitive neuropsychological assessments in broader clinical and research settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.0%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.0%
3
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
11
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%