Linguistic Features from Paragraph Recall are Markers of Cognitive Impairment
Park, S.; Roth, N.; Barker, M.; Auerbach, S.; Perls, T. T.; Cosentino, S.; Au, R.; Libon, D. J.; Sebastiani, P.; Andersen, S. L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveCognitive impairment is associated with language changes that may be elicited from verbal responses during neuropsychological assessments that are not captured in traditional scoring. The current study investigated the utility of a linguistic analysis of paragraph recall responses for differentiating participants with and without cognitive impairment. MethodsDigital voice recordings of Logical Memory (LM) were available from 598 participants from the Long Life Family Study with normal cognition and 112 with cognitive impairment. Linguistic polyfeature scores for immediate (PFS-IR) and delayed recall (PFS-DR) were created from a weighted sum of features associated with cognitive impairment. Logistic regression models assessed the predictive value of each PFS and demographics for classifying cognitive impairment. Repeated measures models with Generalized Estimating Equations assessed whether PFSs predict decline on a cognitive screener. ResultsBoth immediate and delayed PFSs were significantly associated with cognitive status (PFS-IR {beta} = 0.05, p<.001; PFS-DR {beta} = 0.07, p<.001). A classifier with PFS-DR and demographics closely approximated the accuracy of the traditional LM score and demographics (AUC-PR = 0.81 vs 0.84, respectively). A higher PFS-DR was also associated with greater cognitive decline over an average of 5 years of follow-up ({beta} = -0.08, p<.001). ConclusionQuantification of linguistic features from paragraph recall using a linguistic PFS provides sufficient information for detecting cognitive impairment and predicting incident cognitive decline. The linguistic PFS has the potential to be integrated into automated testing, recording, and scoring pipelines allowing for the implementation of sensitive neuropsychological assessments in broader clinical and research settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extensive memory testing improves prediction of progression to MCI in late middle age 95%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 95%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High frequency post-pause word choices and task-dependent speech behavior characterize connected speech in individuals with mild cognitive impairment 94%
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 94%
- Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Network efficiency predicts resilience to cognitive decline in elderly at risk for Alzheimer's 95%
- Character-Level Linguistic Biomarkers for Precision Assessment of Cognitive Decline: A Symbolic Recurrence Approach 94%
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.