Back

Predictors of One-Year Mortality among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Alahdab, F.; Lopuszynski, J.; Alkhateeb, M.; Scott, C.; Zahid, M.

2025-12-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2025.12.17.25342526
Show abstract

BackgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly common. While widely used prognostic scores often rely on limited variables and linear assumptions, they are likely to miss complex risk patterns. We aimed to develop and internally validate prediction models for 1-year all-cause mortality after first hospitalization for decompensated HFpEF and to compare them with standard survival models. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study (2010-2020) using electronic medical records from a large academic health system. Adults with HFpEF (EF[≥]50%) admitted for a first time heart failure exacerbation were included. Variables spanned demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, echocardiography, discharge medications, and outcomes. Data were split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets with stratification by outcome. Missing values were handled with multiple imputation by chained equations. Two tree-based classifiers (Extreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting) were tuned with cross-validation and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration. Time-to-event models included Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest (RSF), and gradient boosting survival (GBS) with concordance index and calibration assessment. Global and local (patient-level) explainability was extracted from each model, with cross-model predictor ranking and comparison. ResultsWe analyzed 7,840 index admissions; mean age was 78 years with 55.6% women. One-year mortality was 31.5%. Test-set AUROC was 0.751 for Extreme Gradient Boosting and 0.749 for Light Gradient Boosting with acceptable calibration. GBS achieved the highest concordance index (0.718), followed by RSF (0.711) and Cox (0.704). Lower serum albumin, older age, higher N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, renal dysfunction, and lower hemoglobin were the most consistent risk signals. ConclusionsDiverse modeling families produced similar discrimination and coherent predictors. A transparent risk tool using routinely available admission data appears feasible, allowing for patient-level risk assessment for precision health.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
11.2%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 45%
11.2%
3
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 3%
7.6%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
5.8%
7
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
4.5%
10
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
11
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 0.9%
2.5%
13
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 45%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
23
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
25
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 15%
0.7%