Learning Patient Similarity from Genomics for Precision Oncology
Shady, M.; Reardon, B.; Jiang, S.; Pimenta, E.; O'Meara, T.; Park, J.; kehl, K. L.; Elmarakeby, H. A.; Sunyaev, S. R.; Van Allen, E. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionPrecision oncology has informed cancer care by enabling the discovery and application of diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive molecular biomarkers. However, many patients lack actionable biomarkers or fail to respond to biomarker-directed therapies. Patient similarity approaches can leverage comprehensive tumor profiling and prior clinical experiences from large cohorts for decision support, facilitating broader realization of precision oncology insights. MethodsWe developed a deep learning-based modeling framework using real-world clinicogenomic data from a tertiary cancer center to (i) measure patient similarity based on embedded tumor genomic profiles and (ii) evaluate the association of derived patient subgroups and neighborhoods with shared therapeutic outcomes in breast cancer-specific and histology-agnostic pan-cancer settings. ResultsThe model recovered clinically meaningful patient clusters reflecting both expected and previously unknown therapeutic associations, as well as patient-specific neighborhoods that could inform therapeutic trajectories more often than expected by chance in multiple clinical contexts. Moreover, model utility extended to patients without actionable genomic biomarkers and those with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) diagnoses, where neighborhoods aligned with independently predicted primary cancer type. These neighborhoods could also be examined over time in a continuously learning scenario. ConclusionThis similarity-based modeling framework distilled complex molecular and clinical data into concise, context-specific insights that augment clinician judgment, providing a foundation for a real-time learning, patient-centered decision support model in precision oncology.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 97%
- The DiffInvex evolutionary model for conditional somatic selection identifies chemotherapy resistance genes in 10,000 cancer genomes 97%
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer PDXs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential chromatin accessibility and transcriptional dynamics define breast cancer subtypes and their lineages 96%
- Cancer-associated fibroblast compositions change with breast cancer progression linking S100A4 and PDPN ratios with clinical outcome 95%
- Cell cycle alterations associate with a redistribution of mutation rates across chromosomal domains in human cancers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Predictive Biomarker Discovery with Contrastive Learning to Improve Clinical Trial Outcomes 96%
- Evolutionary states and trajectories characterized by distinct pathways stratify ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma patients 95%
- Single-cell lineage and transcriptome reconstruction of metastatic cancer reveals selection of aggressive hybrid EMT states 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combined tumor and immune signals from genomes or transcriptomes predict outcomes of checkpoint inhibition in melanoma 96%
- Determination of permissive and restraining cancer-associated fibroblast (DeCAF) subtypes 96%
- Systematic annotation of orphan RNAs reveals blood-accessible molecular barcodes of cancer identity and cancer-emergent oncogenic drivers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision combination therapies based on recurrent oncogenic co-alterations 98%
- Deep Learning Model for Tumor Type Prediction using Targeted Clinical Genomic Sequencing Data 97%
- Multimodal Spatial Profiling Reveals Immune Suppression and Microenvironment Remodeling in Fallopian Tube Precursors to High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.