Persistent health inequalities over 20 years among adults with intellectual disabilities who display behaviours that challenge: Evidence from English primary care records
Jagtiani, M.; Sadik, A.; Marston, L.; Deb, S.; Rai, D.; Perera, B.; Shankar, R.; O'Connell, J.; Hassiotis, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundAdults with intellectual disabilities who display behaviours that challenge (BtC) are more prone to poor health. This study seeks to evidence the long-term health outcomes for this population. MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study of adults with intellectual disabilities aged 18+ years in England using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum (01/2003-12/2023) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics. Main outcome measures were Annual Health Checks (AHCs), GP referrals, emergency visits, outpatient attendance, inpatient admissions, and mortality. ResultsAmong 83,166 adults with intellectual disabilities (mean age 38.6 years), 18.5% had a record of BtC with similar sociodemographic distributions to those without BtC but higher rates of physical and mental health comorbidities and uptake of AHCs. 72.5% of participants with BtC were receiving psychotropic medication(s). Adults with BtC had higher rates of mental health outpatient attendance (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.33 to 1.52) and inpatient admissions (IRR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.29) but consistently lower rates of physical health outpatient attendance (IRR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.84) and inpatient admissions (IRR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.79), after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. BtC was not associated with mortality after adjustment for comorbidities (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.00). ConclusionThis longitudinal study not only corroborated the markedly elevated burden of physical and mental health comorbidities among individuals displaying BtC but also indicated that repeated efforts to improve health outcomes have yielded minimal measurable benefit over time. The apparent absence of progress is likely underpinned by a combination of insufficiently effective or poorly tailored interventions and wider systemic constraints that limit the capacity of services to respond to the complex needs of this population.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 95%
- Co-prescription of Metformin and Antipsychotics in Severe Mental Illness: A UK Primary Care Cohort Study 94%
- Quantifying Care, Qualifying Experiences: A Systematic Review of Measurement-Based Care in Psychiatry from Patient and Provider Perspectives 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 94%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- A thematic analysis of Prevention of Future Death Reports for Children who died by suicide in England and Wales: January 2015 to November 2023 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emerging models and trends in mental health crisis care in England: a national investigation of crisis care systems 92%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 91%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 93%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 93%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.