Beyond Annotation: Leveraging Raw RNA-seq Reads via Foundation Models for Multi-Cancer Early
Lee, S.; Kim, R.; Kim, B.
Show abstract
Early cancer detection substantially improves patient survival, yet conventional screening methods are directed at single anatomical sites and inadequately screen 45.5% of cases. Cell-free RNA (cfRNA) from blood offers a promising, non-invasive avenue for early cancer detection, reflecting real-time transcriptional activity from tumors. However, most RNA-seq pipelines focus exclusively on annotated genes, ignoring the 98% of the human genome comprising unannotated regions including noncoding RNAs, introns, and transposable elements--many dysregulated in cancer. Here we present an annotation-free foundation model framework that learns contextual cfRNA embeddings directly from raw 150bp sequencing reads. Pre-trained on 10 billion reads, our [~]2.5 billion parameter transformer model captures sequence dependencies across annotated and unannotated regions through masked nucleotide prediction and contrastive learning on overlapping fragments. Applied to multi-cancer early detection, our approach achieved high performance using plasma-based cfRNA: 89.7% AUROC for colorectal cancer, 88.6% for lung adenocarcinoma, 88.2% for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and 90.7% for stomach adenocarcinoma. Notably, attention analysis revealed that 30% of the most predictive features originated from unannotated regions, underscoring the diagnostic potential of the "dark transcriptome." This approach enables scalable, reference-free liquid biopsy analysis that uncovers cancer-specific transcriptomic signals often missed by traditional, annotation-dependent pipelines
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biochemical-free enrichment or depletion of RNA classes in real-time during direct RNA sequencing with RISER 96%
- Benchmarking Pre-trained Genomic Language Models for RNA Sequence-Related Predictive Applications 96%
- Comprehensive benchmarking of methods for mutation calling in circulating tumor DNA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.