Network analysis of flowering time genes suggests regulatory changes among SOC1 orthologues in response to cold in Brassica napus
Sidhu, G. S.; Burrows, S.; Woolfenden, H.; Wells, R.; Morris, R. J.
Show abstract
Flowering plants respond to multiple environmental and endogenous cues to determine the timing of their transition from the vegetative to floral state. Most of our knowledge of the gene regulatory network (GRN) controlling flowering time has been derived from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. This knowledge needs to be translated to crop plants to support the development of varieties that can be grown in different and rapidly changing climatic conditions. However, due to increased genome complexity and limited prior knowledge, translation into crops is not always straightforward. Here, we present a study of the GRN controlling flowering time in Brassica napus (oilseed rape), an allotetraploid crop that is a close relative of Arabidopsis. Using a comparative transcriptomics approach, we show that the majority of the orthologous gene pairs have similar expression dynamics over development between Arabidopsis and Brassica napus. Some genes, however, have experienced regulatory changes, with flowering time genes in Brassica napus having higher than average differences in their expression profiles from their Arabidopsis orthologues. Despite these differences, the inferred GRN for flowering in Brassica napus exhibits a similar network topology to the network known in Arabidopsis. This is likely due to preferential retention of these genes in higher paralogue numbers, which allows subtle changes in the regulation of individual paralogues, while still conserving the overall regulatory structure through evolution. We discover and present a detailed analysis of one such example where orthologues of SUPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1) have similar expression patterns under normal conditions, but different dynamics under cold temperature conditions, suggesting possible subfunctionalisation among paralogues in response to temperature change.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Oligosaccharide production and signaling correlate with delayed flowering in an Arabidopsis genotype grown and selected in high 96%
- The genetic interaction of REVOLUTA and WRKY53 links plant development, senescence, and immune responses 94%
- Contrasting a reference cranberry genome to a crop wild relative provides insights into adaptation, domestication, and breeding 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional changes suggest a major involvement of Gibberellins in Trifolium pratense regrowth after mowing 95%
- Transcriptomic analysis of temporal shifts in berry development between two grapevine cultivars of the Pinot family reveals potential genes controlling ripening time 94%
- Metabolic and transcriptomic analyses of nectaries reveal differences in the mechanism of nectar production between monocots (Ananas comosus) and dicots (Nicotiana tabacum) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-expression networks from gene expression variability between genetically identical seedlings can reveal novel regulatory relationships 96%
- Copy number variations shape the structural diversity of Arabidopsis metabolic gene clusters and are associated with the climatic gradient 94%
- A chromosome-level genome assembly of Solanum chilense, a tomato wild relative associated with resistance to salinity and drought 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Epistatic interactions between PHOTOPERIOD-1, CONSTANS 1 and CONSTANS 2 modulate the photoperiodic response in wheat 95%
- The VIL gene CRAWLING ELEPHANT controls maturation and differentiation in tomato via polycomb silencing 95%
- Genome assembly and characterization of a complex zfBED-NLR gene-containing disease resistance locus in Carolina Gold Select rice with Nanopore sequencing 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.