A deep learning framework for comprehensive segmentation of deep grey nuclei
Barat, A.; Singh, S.; Ramesh, R.; Cacciola, A.; Saranathan, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDeep grey matter structures such as the thalamus and basal nuclei are implicated in numerous neurological disorders, yet accurate segmentation of these structures from standard T1-weighted MRI remains challenging due to poor intra-subcortical contrast, long preprocessing pipelines, and fragmented toolsets. MethodsWe introduce THOMASINA a deep learning pipeline for comprehensive subcortical segmentation from standard T1-weighted (T1w) as well as white-matter-nulled (WMn) MRI. The method leverages labels derived from a recently published state-of-the-art multi-atlas segmentation method to train multiple 3D deep learning-based segmentation models including SwinUNETR, DiNTS, and SegResNet. All networks were trained on cropped volumes and tested on held-out and out-of-distribution datasets. For T1-weighted MRI, an additional synthesis step was used to generate WMn-like contrast prior to segmentation. ResultsSegResNet achieved the best performance (mean Dice = 0.89 on with in-domain test data, 0.85 on out-of-domain test data), outperforming DiNTS and SwinUNETR in both accuracy and robustness. It also had the highest mean, median, and minimum Dice and lowest SD in most nuclei compared to the DiNTS and SwinUNETR. Synthetic WMn contrast provided comparable segmentation to actual WMn images. The proposed networks reduced per-subject segmentation time to the order of seconds versus tens of minutes using traditional multi-atlas segmentation. THOMASINA also generalized well across field strengths, scanner vendors, and disease cohorts. ConclusionsTHOMASINA offers a fast, reproducible, and scalable solution for comprehensive subcortical segmentation from standard T1w MRI. By combining synthetic WMn contrast with state-of-the-art deep learning-based segmentation models, our method addresses key barriers to deployment and sets a foundation for biomarker discovery in clinical and population-scale imaging studies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 98%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 97%
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI 98%
- Vendor-neutral sequences (VENUS) and fully transparent workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI 95%
- T1234: A distortion-matched structural scan solution to misregistration of high resolution fMRI data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning microstructure estimation of developing brains from diffusion MRI: a newborn and fetal study 96%
- Triplanar ensemble U-Net model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation on MR images 96%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- FONDUE: Robust resolution-invariant denoising of MR Images using Nested UNets 96%
- ReMiND: Recovery of Missing Neuroimaging using Diffusion Models with Application to Alzheimer’s Disease 96%
- BrainQCNet: a Deep Learning attention-based model for the automated detection of artifacts in brain structural MRI scans. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 98%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 96%
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.