Assessing healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering opportunistic, weight-related conversations in a mental health setting: a mixed methods study
Rodrigues, A. M.; Kemp, E.; Faulkner, S.; McBride, K.; Aquino, M. R. J.; Wilson, R.; Vasiljevic, M.; Robson, C.; Harland, J.; Loraine, M.; Haighton, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundMaking Every Contact Count (MECC) is a person-centred approach to health behaviour change, utilising behavioural science to promote healthy lifestyle choices. Weight-related conversations in mental health settings are particularly important, with users noting gaps in information on medication-related weight gain and support needs. MECC training can address these gaps by improving staff confidence and service delivery, enhancing weight management for individuals with serious mental illness. This study explores staff experiences of weight-related MECC conversations in a mental health setting. MethodsThis mixed-methods study involved healthcare staff from a National Health Service (NHS) mental health inpatient setting in Northeast England. A quantitative online survey administered pre- MECC training, post-MECC training, and 8-10 weeks later captured staff perspectives. Qualitative interviews were conducted with trained and non-trained staff to explore MECC implementation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent and paired-samples t-tests, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis, using the COM-B framework that examines Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation as key drivers of behaviour. ResultsThirty-six staff completed the pre-training survey, 20 completed the post-training survey, and 25 participated in interviews (15 trained, 10 non-trained staff). Quantitative analysis showed that training improved staff perceptions of confidence and motivation to deliver MECC, though most changes were not statistically significant. Perceptions around opportunity (time, resources, social support) declined at follow-up. Perceived importance and usefulness of MECC also declined over time (p < .05). Qualitative analysis identified barriers and facilitators, mapped to the COM-B model. Trained staff highlighted organisational resources, training structure, and wider determinants of health in supporting MECC delivery, alongside skills in rapport-building. Non-trained staff noted gaps in MECC awareness, recording systems, and training but recognised MECC importance and impact. Both groups identified time constraints, confidence, and the integration of MECC within their professional roles as key factors influencing delivery of weight-related conversations. ConclusionMECC training positively impacted healthcare professionals perceptions and confidence in delivering weight-related MECC conversations in mental health settings. While only confidence changes were evident in surveys, qualitative findings showed multifaceted influences on MECC implementation, emphasising the need for sustained support and system-level changes to overcome structural barriers and ensure long-term MECC delivery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 98%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 96%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 95%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 96%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 94%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 95%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 93%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.