Back

FLOWERING LOCUS T genes MtFTb1 and MtFTb2 act redundantly to promote flowering under long days in Medicago truncatula

Perez Santangelo, S.; Macknight, R. C.

2025-12-17 plant biology
10.64898/2025.12.15.694442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Flowering time is a crucial agronomic trait affecting yield and plant performance in different climates and photoperiods. While the molecular pathways regulating photoperiodic flowering are well-characterised in Arabidopsis and cereals, they remain poorly understood in many other groups of plants. FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) genes are key components regulating the transition from vegetative to reproductive stages. In the legume Medicago truncatula, a forage crop, six FT orthologs are present. To date, only the role of MtFTa1 has been described, promoting flowering after prolonged exposure to cold (vernalization), while the other five remains unclear. Here we show that MtFTb1 and MtFTb2 together are essential for flowering under long-day (LD) photoperiods. Using CRISPR/Cas9, we generated Mtftb1 single mutants and Mtftb1/2 double mutants. MtFTb1 and MtFTb2 genes act redundantly and are required to up-regulate MtFTa1 under vernalised LD conditions. While Mtftb1 mutants flower normally under short-day (SD) and LD conditions, Mtftb1/2 mutants are delayed specifically under LD but retain a vernalization response. Transcriptomic analysis of wild-type and Mtftb1/2 mutants shows MtFTb1/2 are essential for MADS-box gene upregulation and modulate known and candidate flowering regulators under LD. These findings advance our understanding of flowering time control in legumes and may inform strategies to improve forage crop productivity. HighlightMtFTb1 and MtFTb2 genes control flowering under long days in Medicago truncatula, revealing clade-specific functions of MtFT genes and providing novel insights into the environmental regulation of flowering time in legumes.

Published in Plant Direct (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.