Back

Nanopore-based profiling of PEGylation in nucleic acid therapeutics

Patino Guillen, G.; Schmidt, T. T.; Baumberg, J. J.; Szostak, J. W.; Keyser, U. F.; Boskovic, F.

2025-12-17 bioengineering
10.64898/2025.12.15.694309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nucleic acid therapeutics, including aptamers, offer effective strategies for programmable and targeted disease treatment. To improve their stability and circulation time, oligonucleotides are often conjugated to hydrophilic polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG). However, current bulk techniques fail to resolve PEG heterogeneity, especially in complex biological environments. Here, we use nanopore sensing to quantify PEG conjugation efficiency of the FDA-approved RNA aptamer pegaptanib. We assembled DNA nanostructures that bind pegaptanib and then we used solid-state nanopores to quantify pegaptanib PEGylation. We further assess pegaptanib PEGylation in a serum background and demonstrate that nanopore sensing resolves PEG moieties of distinct molecular weights within oligonucleotide conjugates. Single-molecule profiling of polymer-RNA conjugates enables iterative improvements in oligonucleotide design and provides a direct means to assess their stability in complex biological environments, thereby advancing the development of more effective nucleic acid therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Nanotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
10
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
11
Advanced Functional Materials
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
12
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
Advanced Materials
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
16
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Chemical Communications
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Nature Chemistry
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
21
Nanoscale
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Langmuir
● 36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Advanced Healthcare Materials
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Bioconjugate Chemistry
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
26
Small Methods
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.