Back

CsubMADS1 overexpression is associated with increased CAB transcript levels and with enhanced tolerance under nutrient limitation.

Nayar, S.

2025-12-17 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.15.690641 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MADS-box transcription factors (TFs) have been extensively studied in seed plants, but their functions in non-seed plants remain comparatively underexplored. CsubMADS1, a MADS-box TF from the microalga Coccomyxa subellipsoidea C-169, was previously shown to influence developmental processes and starvation-associated responses. In this study, overexpression of CsubMADS1 was associated with increased tolerance to nutrient-limiting conditions, particularly during stationary phase and nitrogen starvation. Overexpressing lines exhibited reduced neutral lipid droplet formation and decreased mucilage staining under these conditions--physiological traits typically linked to stress-associated responses in microalgae. RNA-seq analysis identified 19 chlorophyll a/b binding protein (CAB) genes as upregulated in the overexpressors, six of which were validated by qPCR. In wild-type cells, CsubMADS1 was upregulated and CAB transcripts were downregulated during nitrogen starvation, indicating that both the transcription factor and these candidate downstream genes respond to nutrient stress. Six CAB genes contained CArG motifs within their 2 kb upstream regions, and CArG boxes from CAB24 and CAB8 were tested for binding. CAB24 belongs to the stress-responsive LI818 family. Agarose-based EMSA provided preliminary evidence of CsubMADS1 interaction with the CAB24 and CAB8 CArG motifs, with the enriched sequence resembling the AGL15-type C(A/T)8G motif. These observations suggest that CAB gene expression is associated with stress responses and that CsubMADS1 may regulate a subset of CABs, although additional assays are required to confirm direct regulation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
5
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Metallomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
27
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%