Characterizing emergency clinician engagement with social drivers of health data among patients with opioid use disorder
Molina, M. F.; Pimentel, S. D.; Fenton, C.; Adler-Milstein, J.; Gottlieb, L. M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo characterize emergency department (ED) clinician engagement with electronic health record (EHR)-based social drivers of health (SDOH) data; test whether engagement differs in encounters with opioid use disorder (OUD); and, among OUD encounters, assess whether engagement is associated with medications for OUD (MOUD) treatment. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of adult ED encounters (January 2023-October 2024). OUD encounters, identified with a structured phenotype, were matched (1:2) to non-OUD encounters. Audit logs captured clinician engagement with structured SDOH questions ("SDOH Wheel"), ICD-10 Z codes in the Problem List, Social History free text, and social work notes. Engagement was any SDOH documentation or review of preexisting SDOH data during the encounter. Logistic regression estimated associations. ResultsAmong 17,103 encounters (5,701 OUD; 11,402 non-OUD), clinician SDOH documentation was rare (<1%). Clinicians most often reviewed Z codes (610/620; 98.4%), followed by the SDOH Wheel (1,103/3,953; 27.9%), social work notes (1,711/10,670; 16.0%), and Social History free text (232/6,942; 3.3%). Engagement occurred in 19.5% of encounters and was higher with OUD (26.6% vs 16.0%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.77-2.07). Among OUD encounters, engagement showed no clear association with MOUD (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84-1.47), yet racial and ethnic disparities persisted. DiscussionED clinicians infrequently document but do review structured, accessible SDOH data. Engagement is higher in OUD encounters yet shows no definitive link with MOUD, while disparities persist. Interface designs that surface SDOH and targeted EHR decision support warrant evaluation to inform equitable, time-sensitive ED care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 94%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 92%
- Perspectives and Recommendations from Hospitalized Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Qualitative Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 94%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 93%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 93%
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 92%
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for COVID-19 Hospitalizations in 2020 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 94%
- Characterization and Racial Stratification of Social Determinants of Health for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes as Recorded in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Artificial Intelligence Development 91%
- Development and Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for the Detection of Emergency Department Patients with Opioid Misuse from Clinical Notes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 94%
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 94%
- Analyzing Supply and Demand on a General Internal Medicine Ward: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.