Reducing misclassification bias in electronic health record-based GWAS of psychiatric traits using the SuperControl framework
Eick, L.; FinnGen, ; ganna, a.; Yang, Z.
Show abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have enabled large-scale genetic studies of psychiatric disorders, but their diagnostic imprecision introduces substantial misclassification bias. This challenge is particularly pronounced for psychiatric traits, which lack objective biomarkers, exhibit high comorbidity, and are often underdiagnosed due to stigma and help-seeking barriers. We first used simulations to examine how misclassification bias interacts with the classic "super-normal" control design. The results showed that, under moderate to high misclassification, especially for more prevalent traits, excluding individuals with psychiatric comorbidities from the controls can recover power and reduce false positives. Guided by these insights, we constructed a refined SuperControl phenotype in FinnGen for ten psychiatric disorders. Despite reduced sample size, this approach increased genome-wide locus discovery and enhanced biological specificity, with stronger CNS heritability enrichment and improved cross-biobank polygenic prediction, while modestly increasing genetic correlations between traits. We further developed PRISMA, a machine-learning approach that complements the SuperControl phenotype by leveraging excluded individuals through imputation of disease liability. PRISMA further increased locus discovery, revealing significant associations for previously underpowered traits, though with greater pleiotropy and reduced tissue specificity. Together, these findings demonstrate that misclassification in EHR-derived psychiatric phenotypes can meaningfully suppress genetic signal, and that structured control refinement can mitigate this bias. Our results suggest that stricter cohort selection, supplemented by predictive imputation when appropriate, offers a scalable strategy to enhance discovery and generalizability in EHR-based psychiatric genetics.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying loci with different allele frequencies among cases of eight psychiatric disorders using CC-GWAS 97%
- Genome-wide landscape of RNA-binding protein dysregulation reveals a major impact on psychiatric disorder risk 96%
- The impact of rare protein coding genetic variation on adult cognitive function 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for age-of-onset and family history improves power in genome-wide association studies 97%
- The relationship between genotype- and phenotype-based estimates of genetic liability to psychiatric disorders, in practice and in theory. 96%
- Leveraging both individual-level genetic data and GWAS summary statistics increases polygenic prediction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-ancestry meta-analysis of opioid use disorder uncovers novel loci with predominant effects on brain 96%
- Acetylated Chromatin Domains Link Chromosomal Organization to Cell- and Circuit-level Dysfunction in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder 95%
- Fine-mapping genomic loci refines bipolar disorder risk genes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of 64 new risk loci for major depression, refinement of the genetic architecture and risk prediction of recurrence and comorbidities 97%
- Multi-ancestry study of the genetics of problematic alcohol use in >1 million individuals 97%
- Polygenic risk scores lack prognostic value for adults with severe mental illness 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.