Multiobjective design of growth media with genome-scale metabolic models and Bayesian optimization
Hallmann, N.; Guerra-Cornejo, C.; Burgess, K.; Merzbacher, C.; Oyarzun, D. A.
Show abstract
The optimization of culture media is critical for improving the efficiency and cost of cellular production systems. Traditional approaches often rely on extensive experimental trials or statistical methods, which can be both costly and time-consuming. Here, we present gsMOBO, a computational approach for media design that integrates genome-scale metabolic models with multiobjective optimization. Our method employs Flux Balance Analysis coupled with a top-layer Bayesian optimization routine for efficient exploration and optimization of nutrient combinations across high-dimensional spaces. We show that our method finds optimal medium formulations along a Pareto front balancing growth, production and cost of medium components. We illustrate the approach in models of Escherichia coli engineered to produce antibody fragments, as well as Bacillus subtilis strains that synthesize cyclic lipopeptides. Our results show that gsMOBO identifies media compositions and Paretooptimal trade-offs consistent with prior experimental work. Our method provides a broadly applicable tool for the design of cost-effective and productive culture media, and offers a route to accelerate medium development in biomanufacturing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing natural modularity of cellular metabolism to design a modular chassis cell for a diverse class of products by using goal attainment optimization 95%
- OptDesign: Identifying Optimum Design Strategies in Strain Engineering for Biochemical Production 95%
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Microbial Circuit with Application to Intestinal Inflammation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.