Back

A fully-automated integrative workflow to streamline NGS-based analyses within Molecular Tumour Boards

Carta, M. G.; Angeloni, M.; Toegel, L.; Schubart, C.; Hoelsken, A.; Stoehr, R.; Vatrano, S.; Rizzi, D.; Magni, P.; Fraggetta, F.; Hartmann, A.; Haller, F.; Ferrazzi, F.

2025-12-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2025.12.12.25341897 medRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular Tumour Boards (MTBs) rely on different bioinformatics tools and knowledgebases for variant annotation, oncogenicity classification, and estimation of complex biomarkers to identify actionable alterations. However, the typical bioinformatics workflow to process raw next-generation sequencing (NGS) data into clinically meaningful variants involves multiple steps and is inherently complex, thus requiring repeated manual intervention and causing delays in providing molecularly informed precision oncology. Here, we aimed at overcoming these limitations by developing a fully-automated integrative workflow to support NGS-based analyses within MTBs. Our workflow was established at the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen (Germany), and adapted to the fully digitized Pathology department at Gravina Hospital in Caltagirone (Italy), using the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 HRD assay as case study. A trigger event initiates all the downstream bioinformatics analyses to support variant interpretation. In Erlangen, the trigger event is the automatic detection of new NGS data on the Illumina Connected Analytics cloud-based platform. In Caltagirone, the analyses are manually triggered from the anatomic pathology laboratory information system (AP-LIS). The workflow automatically: (i) generates an intuitive overview of sequencing quality metrics, (ii) performs variant annotation, (iii) classifies variant oncogenicity through a fully-automated implementation of the ClinGen/CGC/VICC guidelines, and (iv) generates homologous recombination deficiency scores with genomic instability plots. In the digitized pathology department, results can be readily opened from the AP-LIS and visualized in the patient gallery. Taken together, our end-to-end fully-automated workflow streamlines NGS-based analyses within MTBs by integrating variant interpretation, oncogenicity classification, and estimation of clinically relevant biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
8
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
14
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
20
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%