Back

Harvesting effects on forest condition indicators across Iberian forests: Implications for the EU Nature Restoration Regulation

Rebollo, P.; Ruiz-Benito, P.; Andivia, E.; Zavala, M. A.; Astigarraga, J.; Suvanto, S.; Cruz-Alonso, V.

2025-12-12 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.11.693644 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIForest degradation is posing a growing threat to biodiversity conservation, climate regulation and nature contributions to people worldwide. The EU Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR) recognise the need of healthy forests and has established indicators to assess the condition of forest ecosystems. Forest management practices, especially harvesting may contribute to improve these indicators by, for example, reducing tree density and promoting tree species diversification. C_LIO_LIHere, we assessed temporal trends in forest condition indicators (hereafter, indicators) across Iberian forests since the 80s and evaluated how harvesting occurrence and intensity modulated these trends. Using 46,354 plots from the Spanish Forest Inventory (1986-2022), we analysed trends in indicators depending on stand diversity (monospecific or mixed), protection status (protected or unprotected), origin of the stand (natural or planted), and biogeographical region (Mediterranean or temperate). C_LIO_LIOverall, indicators increased over time. Harvesting occurrence reduced the increases in aboveground carbon stocks, structural diversity, tree species diversity, and standing deadwood; however, it contributed to increase the proportion of native species in specific forest types. Medium to high harvesting intensity negatively impacted aboveground carbon stocks, while medium intensities increased tree species diversity but reduced the structural diversity. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications. Our results suggest that indicators are increasing as stand develops in absence of disturbances such as harvesting. Tree harvesting cannot be considered as a silver bullet to achieve the objectives of the NRR, but it can contribute under certain conditions - specifically at low intensities for carbon stocks and at medium intensities for species diversity. The naturally positive trend of indicators underlines the need to establish thresholds values and minimum rates of changes that distinguish restoration outcomes from natural dynamics. Finally, our study also highlights the key role of forest inventories in monitoring forest condition over time and across diverse landscapes. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%