Back

Exploring the train the trainer model for delivering Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training at scale: A qualitative study

Nichol, B.; Rodrigues, A. M.; Audsley, S.; Haste, A.; Tang, M. Y.; Robson, C.; Harland, J.; Haighton, C.

2025-12-12 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.11.25342056 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the delivery of the train the trainer (TtT) model for Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) region of England. DesignA qualitative study, utilising semi-structured interviews. MethodsInterviews were conducted with 21 participants, including MECC TtT trainees (n = 13), eligible non-trainees (n = 6), and principal trainers (n = 2). Data analysis utilised the Framework Method guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and meta-themes were generated that transcended individual TDF domains. ResultsFour meta-themes were identified; the need for psychological preparedness to deliver MECC training, successful cascade is influenced by the MECC training content, limited accessibility of the pedagogical approach to both MECC TtT and MECC training, and a need to shift the focus from quantity to quality of MECC training cascade. ConclusionsThe TtT model potentially provides unique value for delivering high quality MECC training at scale, providing trainers feel ownership over and able to deliver MECC training. A skills-based approach to MECC training and an experiential learning approach to MECC TtT training is recommended. The MECC TtT programme should provide clear expectations of cascade at sign up stage, allow trainers to adapt content, and evaluate success based on quality. Data availability statementFully anonymised transcripts were uploaded onto the UK data service, publicly accessible here: https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/857461/. The pre-registered protocol is available on Open Science Framework, publicly accessible here: https://osf.io/xz8au.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
28.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
3
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%