Back

Exploring the train the trainer model for delivering Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training at scale: A qualitative study

Nichol, B.; Rodrigues, A. M.; Audsley, S.; Haste, A.; Tang, M. Y.; Robson, C.; Harland, J.; Haighton, C.

2025-12-12 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.11.25342056 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the delivery of the train the trainer (TtT) model for Making Every Contact Count (MECC) training in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) region of England. DesignA qualitative study, utilising semi-structured interviews. MethodsInterviews were conducted with 21 participants, including MECC TtT trainees (n = 13), eligible non-trainees (n = 6), and principal trainers (n = 2). Data analysis utilised the Framework Method guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and meta-themes were generated that transcended individual TDF domains. ResultsFour meta-themes were identified; the need for psychological preparedness to deliver MECC training, successful cascade is influenced by the MECC training content, limited accessibility of the pedagogical approach to both MECC TtT and MECC training, and a need to shift the focus from quantity to quality of MECC training cascade. ConclusionsThe TtT model potentially provides unique value for delivering high quality MECC training at scale, providing trainers feel ownership over and able to deliver MECC training. A skills-based approach to MECC training and an experiential learning approach to MECC TtT training is recommended. The MECC TtT programme should provide clear expectations of cascade at sign up stage, allow trainers to adapt content, and evaluate success based on quality. Data availability statementFully anonymised transcripts were uploaded onto the UK data service, publicly accessible here: https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/857461/. The pre-registered protocol is available on Open Science Framework, publicly accessible here: https://osf.io/xz8au.

Published in British Journal of Health Psychology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.