Back

The Effect of LLM Assistance on Diagnostic Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis

Tretow, I.; Schwebel, M.; Feuerriegel, S.; Treffers, T.; Welpe, I. M.

2025-12-12 health informatics
10.64898/2025.12.11.25341476 medRxiv
Show abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in clinical settings, yet their effect on diagnostic accuracy of physicians has not been systematically quantified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies analyzing LLM-assisted diagnosis published between January 2020 and June 2025. Across 15 studies (43 effect sizes; 498 physicians; 7,274 case evaluations), LLM assistance significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to physicians without LLM support (Hedges g = 0.20, 95% CI 0.12-0.29; P < .001). Although improvements were observed across multiple LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, AMIE, MedFound-DX-PA), medical fields (general medicine, radiology), and career stages of physicians (residents and attendings), the magnitude of the benefit varied substantially. These findings show that LLMs can improve diagnostic accuracy of physicians, but conditions for successful LLM assistance remain unclear. Further clinical evidence is needed to guide safe and effective integration into practice.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.