Back

Exploring the Application of the MoCMC System for Determining In Vitro Product Comparability

Martinez, M.; Longstaff, D. G.

2025-12-13 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2025.12.10.693525 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo explore the utility of the Matrix of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control (MoCMC) approach for evaluating product physicochemical (Q3) similarity as part of a product bioequivalence assessment. MethodologyEach Q3 parameter was converted to a radius of a polygon using a mathematical equation that converted each reference Q3 parameter to a value of "5". That equation was applied to the corresponding test product Q3 parameter and the areas of the treatment polygons determined. The ratio of the product area/outer area [Matrix Comparability Index (MCI)] was calculated using an outer polygon with each radius = "10". When generated across multiple lots for each treatment, the MCI values were statistically compared. Both actual (from our previously published investigation) and hypothetical MCI values were used to characterize the performance of the MoCMC across a range of situations. ResultsMCI values successfully captured product Q3 differences, with the influence of any Q3 parameter decreasing as the number of radii increases. The ability to identify statistically significant product differences decreased as variability of either test or reference MCI values increased. By combining statistical analysis with a comparison of the spread of test and reference MCI values, the MoCMC provided a sensitive tool for assessing product comparability and identified product differences previously missed by comparing in vitro dissolution profiles alone ConclusionsWhile the impetus for this research was to identify a tool for supporting the evaluation of product bioequivalence containing locally acting drugs, its strengths support its potential use across a wider scope of situations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.9%
4
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
9
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%