Back

Microenvironment-Inferred Genotyping: An Exclusionary Classifier for EGFR Amplification When DNA Testing Fails

Baker, E. A.; Mehaffy, N. S.

2025-12-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.12.10.693431 bioRxiv
Show abstract

EGFR amplification occurs in approximately 40-50% of glioblastoma (GBM) cases and is critical for treatment selection [1]. However, GBM tissue samples frequently yield insufficient material for comprehensive molecular testing due to extensive necrosis and tissue quality limitations [2]. This affects thousands of patients annually in the United States [4]. We developed a microenvironment-inferred genotyping approach, enabling molecular classification by measuring the "oligodendrocyte desert" effect when direct genetic testing is impossible. Using single-cell RNA-seq data from 102 GBM patients (1.47M cells) [19], we identified oligodendrocyte exclusion patterns associated with EGFR amplification. We developed a 13-feature machine learning classifier and computationally validated it across an independent external cohort (CPTAC, n=96) and cross-pipeline technical validation using TCGA data processed through three distinct bioinformatic pipelines (n=148 patients) [20,21,22,23]. EGFR-amplified tumors created detectable oligodendrocyte deserts (60-70% depletion, p<0.001). Our exclusionary classifier achieved AUC 0.845 in discovery cohorts and 0.756 average across validation analyses (n=244 unique patients). With a positive predictive value of 94%, this tool identifies high-confidence candidates for EGFR-targeted therapies who would otherwise be excluded from treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm enabling microenvironment-inferred genotyping from routine RNA-seq data, providing rescue diagnosis for EGFR classification when DNA testing fails.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.