Back

Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides

Levin, N.; Mohammed, S.

2025-12-12 systems biology
10.64898/2025.12.10.693381 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To date, collision-induced dissociation and methods based on electron transfer dissociation are considered the standard approaches for the mass spectrometry analysis of N- and O-glycopeptides, respectively, allowing for identification of both peptide and glycan compositions. In recent years, alternative fragmentation methods such as ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) and more energetic versions of electron-based techniques (such as electron ionisation dissociation, EID) have been shown to be useful for the analysis of glycopeptides, producing rich information on the glycopeptide structure, including types of glycosidic linkages. We evaluated ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron ionization dissociation (EID), electron capture dissociation (ECD), and activated-ion ECD (AI-ECD) using an Orbitrap-Omnitrap hybrid for LC-MS analysis of complex N-glycopeptides. Both UVPD and EID generated extensive peptide, glycosidic, and cross-ring fragments, enabling detailed structural characterization. While ECD alone produced few glycopeptide identifications, AI-ECD significantly improved yields through supplemental vibrational activation. UVPD and EID achieved comparable identification efficiencies to stepped collisional dissociation and provided additional linkage information. These results establish the Omnitrap as a powerful platform for comprehensive glycoproteomic analysis and highlight the need for enhanced computational tools to interpret complex UVPD and EID spectra.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.4%
2
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
7
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
18
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%