Back

The future is faeces: Using faecal genomic sequencing to understand dietary choices of an endangered arboreal marsupial

Bratovic, M. J.; Frere, C. H.; Jackson, N.; Moss, L.; Blyton, M. D. J.; Potvin, D. A.

2025-12-12 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.10.693363 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. Understanding critical components of habitat use, such as dietary preferences, is crucial for creating and implementing effective conservation plans. This becomes challenging when species exhibit cryptic behaviours, such as arboreality and nocturnality, as seen in the endangered greater glider (Petauroides spp). Existing methods for determining greater glider diet are inadequate, time consuming and prone to human error. Furthermore, current literature lacks specificity, with most research stating simply that greater gliders are dietary eucalypt specialists, without providing additional insight into which species are eaten. 2. Here, we tested a non-invasive technique using targeted sequencing of species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms from greater glider faecal samples to identify dietary components across multiple locations in Southeast Queensland. 3. Sequencing identified 17 plant species present in the faecal samples, including Angophora, Acacia and Casuarina spp. that were previously unknown to be feed tree taxa, profoundly increasing our understanding of the habitat requirements of this endangered marsupial. Four of these identified species were out of range of their natural occurrence, suggesting limitations to the accuracy of this technique. 4. This study demonstrates the value of using genomic sequencing for analysing diets of arboreal mammals and makes recommendations for improving the accuracy of this methodology for future studies. Our findings highlight key tree species to be considered important for future greater glider conservation plans and raises the question whether there are local drivers behind the differences in dietary choices across the landscape. Such information will be critical for greater glider conservation, particularly when management planning across multiple habitats.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
4
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
8
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
12
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
14
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%