Back

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study

Csikos, N.; Kojouharova, P.; Szabo, G.; Fazekas, G.; Gaal, Z. A.; Czigler, I.

2025-12-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.10.693186 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Visuospatial neglect (VSN) after right-hemisphere stroke causes reduced engagement with left-sided stimuli, but how VSN affects automatic processes, i.e. the registration of regularities and regularity violations is still equivocal. This study investigated these processes using event-related potential components C1, C2/N1, and the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN), and how they differ in VSN compared to stroke and healthy controls, and their changes with time and rehabilitation. We applied a passive oddball paradigm, where diamond patterns periodically disappeared (OFF events) and reappeared (ON events) on the lower left and right sides, creating two simultaneous but independent sequences with standard and deviant events. The study included a VSN group (N=17, M=53.88{+/-}0.28 yrs); stroke patients (N=16, M = 56.81 {+/-} 13.26 yrs); and healthy participants (N=17, M=53.89{+/-}10.79 yrs). The VSN group underwent measurements three times: pre- and post-rehabilitation, and at a 4-month follow-up. Our results show that the C1 component emerged reliably in healthy participants and as a tendency in stroke controls, but not in VSN at any measurement point. The C2/N1 component emerged for all events without group differences. VSN patients showed no reliable vMMN, while it emerged in stroke patients for left-sided OFF events. Healthy controls showed vMMN in every condition. Our results suggest that both stroke and VSN impair the automatic detection of regularity violations, but VSN does so in a more substantial way, and this deficit does not improve with time or rehabilitation. Furthermore, the missing C1 component in VSN may indicate an early-stage deficiency even in visual processing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%