Back

Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Mobile Community-Based Electronic Medical Record System for Community Differentiated HIV Service Delivery in Lilongwe, Malawi

Kiruthu-Kamamia, C.; Weldemariam, H.; Truwa, S.; Kathumba, D.; Huwa, J.; Thawani, A.; Tweya, H.; Groot, W.; Pavlova, M.; Feldacker, C.

2025-12-12 health economics
10.64898/2025.12.10.25342019 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCommunity-based differentiated service delivery (DSD) models are critical for sustaining high-quality HIV care in resource-limited settings. However, these models often rely on labor-intensive documentation processes that reduce efficiency. The Community-based ART Retention and Suppression (CARES) app, a tablet-based electronic medical record system designed through a human-centered design process, was developed to extend Malawis national electronic medical record system into community settings used by Lighthouse Trusts nurse-led community ART program (NCAP). This study evaluated the cost-benefit of implementing CARES within NCAP. MethodsA cost-benefit analysis was conducted from the payer perspective, using data from a time-motion study of NCAP nurses and staff observed before and after CARES implementation. Observations were collected over 28 days between 2022 and 2024. Costs included one-time development, equipment, and training expenses, and annual maintenance costs. Benefits included annual time savings for healthcare workers and reduced documentation errors. All costs were converted to USD, discounted at 5%, and modeled over a 10-year horizon. Outcomes included present value (PV), net present value (NPV), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and break-even benefit. ResultsCARES reduced total time spent on observed NCAP tasks from 8 hours and 9 minutes pre-implementation to 4 hours and 23 minutes post-implementation. Annual benefits totaled $7,108, primarily from nurse time savings. The 10-year present value (PV) of benefits was $54,883, compared with PV costs of $46,499, yielding a net present value of $8,384 and a benefit-cost ratio of 1.18. CARES exceeded the annual benefit required for cost-neutrality by approximately $1,086, indicating a positive economic return under routine implementation. ConclusionCARES substantially reduced the time required for healthcare worker documentation within a routine community-based DSD model and surpassed cost-neutrality, generating a net economic benefit over 10 years. These efficiency gains create additional capacity for patient care and reinforce the platforms operational sustainability. CARES provides a practical foundation for additional, future AI-enabled enhancements. Continued evaluation is needed to quantify clinical and system-wide benefits beyond time savings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.