Back

The Impact of Craniotomy and Surgical Fixation Devices on the Efficacy of Tumor Treating Fields in Glioblastoma Treatment

Cao, F.; Mikic, N.; Weise, K.; Thielscher, A.; Korshoj, A. R.

2025-12-13 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.10.25342010 medRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma is increasingly treated with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), but how post-craniotomy anatomy and fixation hardware alter delivered fields is unclear. We used finite-element modeling in a realistic head model to simulate TTFields after a standard bone flap with either a non-penetrating fixation plate or a penetrating skull clamp, and compared results to an intact-skull baseline across a range of clinically used array layouts. Bone gaps increased mean brain electric-field magnitude by [~]10-20%. Non-penetrating plates caused only minimal, localized changes relative to the bone-gap condition. In contrast, penetrating clamps produced strong but spatially confined increases: local mean fields were [~]6-8x higher within 5-10 mm of the device, with [≥] 50% enhancement extending [~]50-60 mm depending on whether the gap was modeled as healed scalp (soft-tissue-like) or healed bone; this enhancement decayed with distance. These simulations, performed in a single head model with literature-based tissue conductivities, suggest that penetrating hardware can substantially modulate local TTFields delivery, whereas non-penetrating plates have minimal impact. Accounting for post-surgical anatomy and hardware in TTFields planning may improve dose targeting.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.