Back

Loneliness and Cognitive Decline Among U.S. Adults: A Stratified Analysis of the BRFSS

Fasokun, M. E.; Ogundare, T.; Ogunyankin, F.; Gordon, K.; Ikugbayigbe, S.; Michael, M.; Hughes, K.; Akinyemi, O.

2025-12-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2025.12.10.25342005 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLoneliness is an emerging public health concern linked to adverse mental and physical outcomes. It may play a key role in cognitive aging, yet its population-level association with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) across demographic groups is not well characterized. We evaluated how the frequency of loneliness relates to SCD in U.S. adults and whether associations differ by sex, age and race/ethnicity. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of adults aged [&ge;]16 years using nationally representative 2016-2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (BFRSS). Loneliness was categorized as never, rarely, sometimes, usually or always. The primary outcome was self-reported SCD in the past year. Survey-weighted logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors, health insurance, metropolitan status and survey year were used to estimate adjusted marginal probabilities of SCD across loneliness categories. Interaction terms and stratified margins evaluated effect modification by sex, age group (16-44, 45-64 and [&ge;]65 years) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic). ResultsAmong 85,969 adults who reported loneliness, 13,879 (16.2%) experienced subjective cognitive decline (SCD), with a mean age of 65.7 {+/-} 10.6 years. Loneliness showed a strong dose-response relationship with SCD. Predicted probabilities of SCD increased from 9.9 % (95 % CI, 9.3-10.5 %) among respondents who never felt lonely to 15.0 % (14.1-15.9 %) for rarely, 24.9 % (23.6-26.1 %) for sometimes, 38.4 % (34.4-42.5 %) for usually and 45.7 % (41.0-50.4 %) for always lonely adults (p < 0.001). Women who were always lonely had an adjusted probability of SCD that was 10.7 percentage points higher than men; sex differences were negligible at lower loneliness levels. Age differences were minimal across most loneliness categories; however, among adults who were always lonely, those aged >64 years had significantly lower predicted cognitive function compared with adults aged 18-64 years (p < 0.001). Racial and ethnic differences were modest; the only significant contrast was a 1.7 percentage-point lower probability of SCD for non-Hispanic Black adults compared with Whites among those who never felt lonely. Other subgroup differences were not statistically significant. ConclusionsLoneliness is independently and strongly associated with higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline among U.S. adults, and this relationship is most pronounced for chronic loneliness. While sex and age modified the effect of loneliness, racial/ethnic disparities were minimal. These findings identify loneliness as a modifiable social determinant of cognitive health, supporting the need for broad social connection initiatives and targeted efforts for women and mid-life adults with chronic loneliness.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
4
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
8
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%