Back

Pre- and Post-Flavor Ban Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Chemical, Sensory, and Young Adult Appeal Analysis

Peraza, N.; Thakur, R. S.; Jabba, S. V.; Aguilera, J.; Martines, P. W.; Brinkman, M. C.; Jordt, S. E.; El Hellani, A.; Monterosso, J. R.; Tackett, A. P.

2025-12-12 addiction medicine
10.64898/2025.12.10.25341992 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe tobacco industry exploits legislative loopholes by introducing products with novel constituents, sensory features, and/or branding to bypass flavor restrictions and maintain appeal, particularly among young populations. Post Californias 2022 flavor ban, leading oral nicotine pouch (ONP) brand (ZYN) started marketing two new "unflavored" products, Classic and Original, but it is unknown if they differed from pre-ban products marketed as "flavor-ban approved" (Chill and Smooth) in their chemical composition, sensory characteristics and human appeal. MethodsNicotine, menthol, and synthetic coolants, WS-3 and WS-23, were quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Menthol receptors (TRPM8 and TRPA1) activity was measured by calcium-microfluorimetry to assess cooling-and irritation-potential. ONP sensory attributes and appeal were assessed in young-adults (21-25Yr old) after 5-minute standardized use in a double-blind, randomized remote trial. Results"Chill" and "Classic" ONPs contained WS-3 exclusively (0.24{+/-}0.02 mg/pouch), with consistent levels across nicotine strengths; "Smooth" and "Original" contained neither menthol nor WS-3. Extracts of "Chill" and "Classic" robustly activated the cold/menthol TRPM8-receptor with similar potency and efficacy, while weakly activating the sensory irritant TRPA1 receptor. Human participants rated "Chill" and "Classic" as having stronger cooling sensations (p<0.05), while "Classic" was rated as more minty flavored when compared to unflavored "Smooth" and "Original" (p<0.005) ONPs. Conclusions and RelevancePre- and post-ban ONPs showed similar chemical, sensory, and appeal profiles based on WS-3 presence. By using concept names and sensory cues to disguise flavors, industry exploits regulatory loopholes to sustain marketing of banned products. What is already known on this topicOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have gained popularity among young adults, and manufacturers have introduced products and marketed as "ban-compliant" with concept names and sensory additives that may mimic flavors despite flavor bans. What this study addsChemical, receptor, and sensory analyses of pre- and post-ban ZYN ONPs showed both contained the synthetic coolant WS-3, producing flavor-like cooling sensations even without menthol or other flavor compounds. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyFindings indicate that post-ban ONPs retain the same sensory and chemical properties as pre-ban products, highlighting enforcement challenges when odorless sensory additives and branding strategies allow products to retain flavor-like effects despite legislative restrictions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
4
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.8%
7
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%