Back

The effects of vortioxetine versus placebo on cognitive functioning in mild cognitive impairment: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study

Matev, V.; Rothenberg, M.; Donath, J.; Cukaci, C.; Kloebl, M.; Al Barede, K.; Stoehrmann, P.; Doerl, G.; Lanzenberger, R.; Winkler, D.; Winkler-Pjrek, E.

2025-12-11 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2025.12.10.25341977 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThis study investigates the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). MCI is characterized by memory impairment and deficits in other cognitive domains and has been found to progress into Alzheimers dementia (AD) in some cases. In a recent open-label, single-arm study, vortioxetine, an antidepressant, was associated with improved cognitive function in patients with MCI, however, no placebo-controlled studies have been conducted to support these findings. MethodsForty-seven subjects diagnosed with MCI were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either 10 mg vortioxetine, 20 mg vortioxetine, or placebo over 12 weeks, in a randomized, double-blind study design. Neuropsychological tests were conducted several times during the trial, including at a baseline screening visit, consisting of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), a German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test ("Verbaler Lern-und Merkfahigkeitstest", VLMT), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS). Statistical analysis of neuropsychological data was performed using linear mixed models (LMM) and subsequent post-hoc testing to account for multiple comparisons. ResultsLMM results showed a significant increase in VLMT test scores from baseline to week 12 in the 10 mg (p = 0.02) and 20 mg vortioxetine groups (p = 0.017). The placebo group showed a significant increase in test scores from baseline to week 4 (p = 0.009), followed by a significant decrease in test performance observed from week 4 to week 8 (p = 0.006). Both the vortioxetine and placebo groups showed statistically significant DSST test score changes over 12 weeks (10mg: p = 0.004; 20mg: p <.0001; placebo: p <.0001). Similarly, ADAS-Cog test performance significantly increased from baseline to week 12 in both the 10 mg vortioxetine group (p = 0.02) and the placebo group (p = 0.002). MMSE test results showed significant improvement over 8 weeks in the 20 mg vortioxetine group (p = 0.011), compared to no significant findings in the 10 mg and placebo groups. A significant improvement of QOLS scores was observed from week 8 to week 12 in the 10 mg vortioxetine group only (p = 0.033). ConclusionThe results of this study indicate a potential treatment effect of vortioxetine on verbal learning and memory processes in patients with MCI. However, the effects of vortioxetine could not be found at the group level; thus, further research and larger RCTs are needed to elucidate its underlying mechanisms and potential in MCI and early AD treatment.

Matching journals

The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.