Opportunistically Detecting Signs of Hypertension on a Consumer Smartwatch
Di Achille, P.; Cai, L.; Wu, J.; Gao, M.; Daryani, B.; Wang, J.; Khanna, U.; Ko, H.; Pathak, A.; Malhotra, M.; Patel, S.; Shreibati, J. B.; Juraschek, S. P.; Rudrapatna, P.; Thompson, M.; Poh, M.-Z.
Show abstract
Hypertension is a silent killer, with over half of affected adults unaware of their condition1,2. This lack of awareness is a major concern, as early intervention is critical for preventing major adverse cardiovascular events3,4. While cuffless wearable blood pressure (BP) monitors offer comfort and convenience, their reliance on periodic calibration and inconsistent accuracy have limited their clinical adoption5,6. Here we show that applying artificial intelligence (AI) pre-trained on almost 500,000 hours of data to multimodal waveforms (photoplethysmography and accelerometry) recorded using a widely available consumer smartwatch (AI-PPG-ACC-HTN), without any cuff calibration, can detect hypertension with accuracy levels comparable to traditional cuffed BP devices in the existing clinical framework, including both initial and confirmatory screening. We validated AI-PPG-ACC-HTN in a prospective, multicenter study of 196 diverse participants free from known cardiovascular disease and antihypertensive medication against gold-standard 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Over seven days of real-world monitoring, AI-PPG-ACC-HTN detected hypertension with a sensitivity of 65.8% (95% CI, 54.0%-76.3%), specificity of 90.0% (83.2-94.7), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.6% (68.6-89.6). In comparison, initial office BP screening achieved a sensitivity of 55.3% (43.4-66.7), specificity of 90.0% (83.2-94.7) and PPV of 77.8% (64.4-88.0). For confirmatory testing of participants with elevated BP identified by initial office BP screening (N=48), AI-PPG-ACC-HTN detected hypertension with a sensitivity of 78.4% (61.8-90.2), specificity of 90.9% (58.7-99.8) and PPV of 96.7% (82.8-99.9). Comparatively, repeat office BP achieved a sensitivity of 67.6% (50.2-82.0), specificity of 63.6% (30.8-89.1) and PPV of 86.2% (68.3-96.1); multiday home BP monitoring achieved a sensitivity of 89.2% (74.6-97.0), specificity of 81.8% (48.2-97.7) and PPV of 94.3% (80.8-99.3). These results highlight an opportunity for consumer smartwatches to facilitate population-level opportunistic hypertension screening, offering an accessible tool to address this major public health challenge.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 94%
- Derivation of an Outcome-Driven Threshold for Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity: An Individual-Participant Meta-Analysis 93%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood pressure management in 1,000 patients with CureApp HT digital therapeutics for hypertension 94%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 93%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Within-visit Blood Pressure Variability in Children and Adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020) 94%
- Differences between brachial and aortic blood pressure in adolescence and their impact on classification of hypertension 93%
- Physical activity and favourable adiposity genetic liability reduce the risk of hypertension among high body mass individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 93%
- Improving Pre-eclampsia Risk Prediction by Modeling Individualized Pregnancy Trajectories Derived from Routinely Collected Electronic Medical Record Data 92%
- Response to Polygenic Risk: Results of the MyGeneRank Mobile Application-Based Coronary Artery Disease Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 94%
- Genetic Predictors of Blood Pressure Traits are Associated with Preeclampsia 93%
- Prediction of vascular ageing based on smartphone acquired PPG signals 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.