Long-term positive effects of olfactory training on quality of life and subjective measures of olfactory function
Winter, A. L.; Sahlstrand, P. N.; Lundstrom, J. N.
Show abstract
Olfactory dysfunction following viral infection is a debilitating condition. Currently, the recommended treatment for olfactory dysfunction is olfactory training, a systematic and repeated exposure to odors over a prolonged period. A new tool has been proposed for olfactory training that present odors using nasal inserts rather than hand-held devices, to increase ease of training and thereby improving compliance and adherence to the training regimen. Here, we aimed to determine how olfactory training affects subjective experience of quality of life and olfactory function and potential differences training using regular versus the nasal insert setup. Using a randomized controlled design (N = 111), we investigated the effects of an 8-week olfactory training regimen using nasal inserts compared to standard care olfactory training in individuals with post-viral functional hyposmia. Subjective measures of quality of life as well as qualitative and quantitative olfactory function were assessed before and after the training regimen, and during a 1-year follow-up. Overall, participants showed significant and sustained improvements in both subjective olfactory function and quality of life following training. Critically, the nasal insert group demonstrated greater gains in social functioning and quantitative olfactory scores shortly after training, with enhanced olfactory benefits persisting at the 1-year follow-up. The magnitude of changes in quality of life was correlated with subjective olfactory improvement overall, with a stronger association for the nasal insert group. Thus, nasal insert training appears to enhance perceived olfactory function, which coincides with improved quality of life. Findings from this trial provide insight into the benefits of olfactory training on subjective functioning and quality of life, as well as the efficacy of nasal insert training in post-viral hyposmia.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Persisting Chemosensory Impairments in 366 Healthcare Workers Following COVID-19: An 11-Month Follow-up 96%
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 95%
- Chemosensory dysfunctions induced by COVID-19 can persist up to 7 months: A study of over 700 healthcare workers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of olfactory disorders 18 months after contracting COVID-19 93%
- The effect of odor enrichment on olfactory acuity: Olfactometric testing in mice using two mirror-molecular pairs. 91%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of an open-source, disposable, 3D-printed in vitro environmental exposure system for Transwell culture inserts 89%
- COPD in the time of COVID-19: An analysis of acute exacerbations and reported behavioural changes in patients with COPD 89%
- Development and validation of a parent proxy bronchiectasis child quality of life instrument: The BC-QoL 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 94%
- Diagnostic accuracy of a novel SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test from standardized self-collected anterior nasal swabs 90%
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital intervention mylovia improves sexual functioning in women with sexual dysfunction in randomized controlled trial 89%
- Automatic Identification of Tinnitus Malingering Based on Overt and Covert Behavioral Responses During Psychoacoustic Testing 89%
- Smartphone keyboard dynamics predict affect in suicidal ideation 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.